Traduction de «all-purpose bank » (Anglais → Français) :

all-purpose bank | combined commercial and investment bank | full-service bank | multibank | multi-purpose bank | non-specialized bank | universal bank

all-purpose bank | multiple bank | multipurpose bank | universal bank

All-purpose bank | Global banking (2) | Multi-purpose bank (1) | Universal bank (1)

multipurpose bank | multiservice bank | multiple bank | all-purpose bank | universal bank

full-service bank [ full service bank | universal bank | all-purpose bank | multibank ]

special purpose bank

combined commercial and investment bank | multibank | all-purpose bank | full service bank

all purpose credit | all-purpose credit | all purpose credit facility

Task Force on the Integrated Data Base for Air Traffic Flow Management Purposes [ Task Force on the Integrated Data Base for ATFM Purposes | Task Force on the Central Data Bank for Air Traffic Flow Management Purposes | Task Force on the Central Data Bank for ATFM Purposes ]

for any purpose it may serve [ for all useful purposes | for all purposes ]

The purpose of the data collected under Regulation (EU) No 1011/2012 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2012/24) is to provide the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) with comprehensive statistical information on the exposure of economic sectors and group data reporting agents in the Member States whose currency is the euro to specific classes of securities at a very disaggregated level.

31. Recognises the important role played by money market funds (MMFs) in the financing of financial institutions in the short run and in allowing for risk diversification; recognises the different role and structure of MMFs based in the EU and the US; recognises that the 2010 ESMA guidelines imposed stricter standards on MMFs (credit quality, maturity of underlying securities and better disclosure to investors); notes, however, that some MMFs, in particular those offering a stable net asset value to investors, are vulnerable to massive runs; stresses, therefore, that additional measures need to be taken to improve the resilience of these funds and to cover the liquidity risk; supports the October 2012 IOSCO final report in its proposed ...[+++] recommendations for the regulation and management of MMFs across jurisdictions; believes that MMFs that offer a stable net asset value (NAV) should be subject to measures designed to reduce the specific risks associated with their stable NAV feature and internalise the costs arising from these risks; considers that regulators should require, where workable, a conversion to floating/variable NAV, or, alternatively, safeguards should be introduced to reinforce stable NAV MMFs’ resilience and ability to face significant redemptions; invites the Commission to submit a review of the UCITS framework, with particular focus on the MMF issue, in the first half of 2013, by requiring MMFs either to adopt a variable asset value with a daily evaluation or, if retaining a constant value, to be obliged to apply for a limited-purpose banking licence and be subject to capital and other prudential requirements; stresses that regulatory arbitrage must be minimised;

31. Recognises the important role played by money market funds (MMFs) in the financing of financial institutions in the short run and in allowing for risk diversification; recognises the different role and structure of MMFs based in the EU and the US; recognises that the 2010 ESMA guidelines imposed stricter standards on MMFs (credit quality, maturity of underlying securities and better disclosure to investors); notes, however, that some MMFs, in particular those offering a stable net asset value to investors, are vulnerable to massive runs; stresses, therefore, that additional measures need to be taken to improve the resilience of these funds and to cover the liquidity risk; supports the October 2012 IOSCO final report in its proposed ...[+++] recommendations for the regulation and management of MMFs across jurisdictions; believes that MMFs that offer a stable net asset value (NAV) should be subject to measures designed to reduce the specific risks associated with their stable NAV feature and internalise the costs arising from these risks; considers that regulators should require, where workable, a conversion to floating/variable NAV, or, alternatively, safeguards should be introduced to reinforce stable NAV MMFs’ resilience and ability to face significant redemptions; invites the Commission to submit a review of the UCITS framework, with particular focus on the MMF issue, in the first half of 2013, by requiring MMFs either to adopt a variable asset value with a daily evaluation or, if retaining a constant value, to be obliged to apply for a limited-purpose banking licence and be subject to capital and other prudential requirements; stresses that regulatory arbitrage must be minimised;

Credible financing arrangements are also needed, for which purpose bank levies could be used to raise the resources for resolution funds.