Translation of "Annulling Part Train Order " (English → French) :

(Return tabled) Question No. 334 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to bijuralism and harmonization: (a) what measures are in place to ensure legislative bijuralism across all departments; (b) since the adoption of the “Policy on Legislative Bijuralism”, how has the Department of Justice (i) ensured that all legal counsel in the Department are made aware of the requirements of legislative bijuralism in order for them to be able to take it into account when advising client departments on legislative reforms, (ii) enhanced the capacity of ...[+++]the Legislative Services Branch to draft bijural legislative texts, (iii) undertook, in drafting both versions of every bill and proposed regulation that touches on provincial or territorial private law, to take care to reflect the terminology, concepts, notions and institutions of both of Canada’s private law systems; (c) since the adoption of the “Policy for Applying the Civil Code of Quebec to Federal Government Activities”, what measures are in place to ensure (i) changes to Quebec’s Civil Code are known and monitored by the government, (ii) assessment of federal legislation relative to changes to Quebec’s Civil Code, (iii) federal legislation is introduced to reflect, where necessary, changes to the Civil Code of Quebec; (d) with respect to the “Index of Bijuralism and Harmonization Caselaw” found online and indicating its most recent update was June 12, 2012, (i) how often is this page updated, (ii) given that some cases thereupon are from 2013, when was this page last updated, (iii) whose responsibility is it to update this page, (iv) what cases are currently being monitored for potential addition to this page; (e) with respect to cases involving bijuralism and harmonization, (i) in what ways are these made known to the Department, (ii) whose responsibility it is to monitor these cases, (iii), what role does the Federal government play in these cases if a party, (iv) what role does the government play if not a party, (v) who m ...

Held: The judgment of the European Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) in Case F-52/05 Q v Commission [2008] ECR-SC I-A-1-409 and II-A-1-2235 is set aside in that, at paragraph 2 of the operative part, it orders the Commission to pay to Q damages of EUR 500 and also the sum of EUR 15 000, in so far as that sum is intended to make good the non-pecuniary damage sustained by Q owing to an alleged delay in initiating the administrative investigation, and as, for the purposes of dismissing the remainder of the application at first instance, at paragraph 3 of the operative part, it adjudicates, at paragraphs 147 to 189 of the grounds of the ...[+++] judgment, on ‘the complaint of psychological harassment raised by [Q]’ and states, at paragraph 230 of the grounds of the judgment, that there is no longer any need to rule on the claim for annulment of the 2003 career development reports concerning Q, drawn up for the periods 1 January to 31 October and 1 November to 31 December 2003 respectively.

The Council encourages candidate and potential candidate countries to sign memorandums of understanding to take part in the European Union's financial programmes in the field of justice, according to the conditions set in those programmes, in order to ensure their effective participation in European judicial training projects.

A dynamic approach to security should also be fostered, reflecting the major contribution of access to training. While investment by enterprises in the training of adult workers represents 2.3% of total labour costs, according to most recent available data, an increase is imperative in order to promote the adaptability of the workforce, raise productivity and encourage active ageing. Improved working conditions - including health and safety at work - are also part of the ne ...[+++]cessary balance between flexibility and security and are particularly needed to achieve an increase in labour force participation, notably for older workers and the disabled.

Under the common position, the aim of the common framework of objectives is to contribute to the achievement of the objectives of Article 127 of the Treaty by pursuing a number of objectives such as: - improving the quality and innovation capacity of Member States' vocational training systems and arrangements; - developing the European dimension in vocational training and vocational guidance; - promoting lifelong training so as to encourage the ongoing adaptation of skills to meet the needs of workers and undertakings, contribute to reducing unemployment and facilitate personal development; - giving all young people in the Community w ...[+++]ho so wish the possibility of one or, if possible, two or more years of initial vocational training after their full-time compulsory education, leading to a vocational qualification recognized by the competent authorities of the Member State in which it is obtained; - encouraging specific vocational training measures for adults without adequate vocational qualifications, in particular adults without adequate education; - supporting vocational policies in such a way that all workers in the Community have access to continuing vocational training throughout their working life without any discrimination; - promoting equality of opportunity as regards access for men and women to vocational training and their effective participation therein, in particular so as to open up new areas of work to them and to encourage them to return to work after a career break; - supporting activities aimed at developing linguistic skills as part of vocational training measures; - promoting the development of vocational guidance facilities in order to guarantee life-long high-quality vocational guidance for all.

In part, we are trying to do more collective training and reduce the amount of individual training in order to reduce that demand.