Translation of "Group 15 " (English → French) :

EU body for police and judicial cooperation [ Ad Hoc Group on Immigration | Group on Drugs and Organised Crime | Group on Police and Customs Cooperation | Group on the Free Movement of Persons | Rhodes Group | Steering Group II | Trevi Group ]

Group of 15 | Group of Fifteen | G15 [Abbr.]

ECOWAS Ceasefire Monitoring Group | ECOWAS Military Observer Group | ECOWAS Monitoring Group | Military Observer Group of ECOWAS | Military Observer Group of the Economic Community of West African States | ECOMOG [Abbr.]

Group of Twenty-Four [ G24 | G-24 | Group of 24 | Intergovernmental Group of 24 | Intergovernmental Group of Twenty-Four on International Monetary Affairs | Intergovernmental Group of Twenty-four on International Monetary Affairs and Development ]

sociocultural group [ socio-cultural group ]

Definition: Disorder involving persistent dissocial or aggressive behaviour (meeting the overall criteria for F91.- and not merely comprising oppositional, defiant, disruptive behaviour) occurring in individuals who are generally well integrated into their peer group. | Conduct disorder, group type Group delinquency Offences in the context of gang membership Stealing in company with others Truancy from school

Expert Group on International Standards of Accounting and Reporting | Group of Experts on International Standards of Acccounting and Reporting | Intergovernmental Working Group of Experts on International Standards of Accounting and Reporting | UN ISAR Group

guide groups of tourists | manage groups of tourists | manage tourist groups | manage tourists in groups

Group A shigellosis [Shiga-Kruse dysentery]

More people in the 15 - 24 age group have foreign language skills than in the 25 - 39 age group, who in turn are better at foreign languages than those in the 40 - 54 age group.

Commission Actions supporting eCall Action Plan Organising two High-Level meetings with Member States promoting 112 and eCall in October 2005, plus several expert meetings and bilateral meetings Expert Group on Emergency Access[11] established in February 2006; launch of a survey on the organisation of emergency services in the Member States (including 112, E112) Infringement procedures opened against Member States on the concerns of the non-availability of caller location information (12 cases against Belgium, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, the Netherlands, Portugal and Slovakia) Informal PSAP E ...[+++]xpert Group[12] established in July 2006, addressing issues specific to emergency rescue services (112, E112 and eCall) and spreading best practices eImpact, in-depth study on the socio-economic benefits of intelligent vehicle safety systems (including eCall) launched in January 2006[13] Toolbox, containing all relevant information related to the eCall initiative launched in November 2005, maintained by eSafetySupport[14] Eurobarometer study on the citizen's perception of road safety and intelligent vehicle safety systems launched in January 2006 Provision of the ICT 2006 standardisation work programme and Request to ETSI (ETSI MSG, Mobile Services Group) to produce the necessary standards for eCall as a priority item Working with the Member States towards a solution on the data protection and privacy issues (Art. 29 Working Party, established by Directive 95/46/EC)[15] Successful demonstration of the full eCall service chain by GST Rescue[16] |

(i) Discard Plan for Demersal Fisheries in the Adriatic Sea (GSAs 17 and 18) — Joint Recommendation by the Adriatica High-Level Group (Croatia, Italia and Slovenia); (ii) Discard Plan for Demersal Fisheries in the South-Eastern Mediterranean Sea (GSAs 15, 16, 19, 20, 22, 23 and 25) — Joint Recommendation by the Sudestmed High-Level Group (Cyprus, Greece, Italy and Malta); and (iii) Discard Plan for Demersal Fisheries in the Western Mediterranean Sea (GSAs 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11) — Joint Recommendation by the Pescamed High-Level Group (France, Italy and Spain).

67. Notes that since January 2012, a new set of rules came into force governing the reception of visitors' groups, including the method of paying subsidies; notes that the Bureau decided to maintain the option to make cash payments to visitor groups; is concerned about the significant reputational and security risk entailed in making cash payments to visitor groups; asks for a new decision of the bureau to abolish cash payments which constitutes a violation of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council; takes note that out of approximately 2 000 visitor groups annually, only 365 in 2012 received more than EUR ...[+++]15 000 but that the majority of these visitors' groups opt for cash payment method, although Parliament’s administration encourages payment by bank transfer or a mix of both methods instead;