Traduction de «Operative part the judgment » (Anglais → Français) :

operative part of the judgment | operative provisions of the judgment

operative part of the judgment

terms of a judgment [ operative part of a judgment ]

operative part of every judgment and interim order

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

getting involved in the day-to-day operation of the company | take part in the day-to-day operation of the company | get involved in the day-to-day operation of the company | get involved in the day-to-day operations

The Judgments Extension Act [ An Act to facilitate the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments in Saskatchewan and in other Parts of Her Majesty's Dominions ]

Definition: The main features are multiple, recurrent and frequently changing physical symptoms of at least two years' duration. Most patients have a long and complicated history of contact with both primary and specialist medical care services, during which many negative investigations or fruitless exploratory operations may have been carried out. Symptoms may be referred to any part or system of the body. The course of the disorder is chronic and fluctuating, and is often associated with disruption of social, interpersonal, and fami ...[+++]ly behaviour. Short-lived (less than two years) and less striking symptom patterns should be classified under undifferentiated somatoform disorder (F45.1). | Briquet's disorder Multiple psychosomatic disorder

Canada Oil and Gas Production and Conservation Regulations [ Regulations Respecting Safety, Conservation Practices and the Prevention of Pollution in Operations undertaken for the Production of Oil and Gas in the Parts of Canada under the Oil and Gas Production and Conservation Act ]

On the other hand, there is a legitimate policy on the part of judgment creditors to have an effective and efficient judgment-enforcement system.

In the present case, it is clear both from the operative part of the 2004 judgment and from that of the 2008 judgment that the failure to fulfil obligations established by the Court relates to the failure to repeal national legislation.

According to the Court, it is apparent from both the operative part of the 2007 judgment, which contains the decision of the Court, and the grounds for that decision that the Court did not establish that there had been a failure to fulfil obligations resulting from the provision relating to the lower blocking minority, considered in isolation, but established that there had been such a failure solely as regards the combination of that provision with the provision relating to the cap on voting rights.

When a provision such as that referred to in paragraph 1 of the operative part of this judgment has been disapplied by a national court because it is incompatible with EU law, it is contrary to EU law for that court to apply, by way of substitution, an earlier provision of national law in substance similar to that disapplied, which provides for the grant of exemption from the obligation to purchase green certificates owing to the introduction, onto the national consumer market, of electricity imported from a third State, by means of the prior conclusion, between the national grid manager and an equivalent local autho ...[+++]rity of that third State, of an agreement determining the verification arrangements necessary for the purpose of certifying that the electricity thus imported is electricity produced from renewable energy sources.