Traduction de «Sub-Committee on the Study Sport in Canada » (Anglais → Français) :

Sub-Committee on Relations with the United States of America and Canada

Sub-Committee on the Study of Sport in Canada [ Parliamentary Sub-Committee on the Study of Sport in Canada ]

Report to Parliament, Sub-committee on the Penitentiary System in Canada: Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs [ Report to Parliament, Sub-committee on the Penitentiary System in Canada ]

Inter-Parliamentary Union's Sub-Committee for the Study of the Means to Control the Pollution of the Mediterranean Sea

2. Notes with considerable concern that the most recent report of the Scientific Sub-committee of CECAF held in 2005 found that at that time, all stocks of small pelagics were fully exploited and most stocks of demersal species were over-exploited, with some being fully exploited; that a study by the FAO Northwest Africa Small Pelagic Working Group concluded in 2010 that the situation had deteriorated, with two stocks of small pelagics (horse mackerel and sardinella) now being over-exploited;

The negotiation process is based on the decision CM/Del/Dec/1145/8.1 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe dated 13 June 2012, following Resolution No 1 adopted by the 12th Council of Europe Conference of Ministers responsible for Sport which indicates that the scope of the draft instrument and its provisions should be based on Recommendation CM/Rec(2011)10, and on the feasibility study MSL12 (2012) 4 rev3.

83. Welcomes the commitment of the Austrian Presidency to continue the practice of demarches in respect of all of the EU's international partners regarding the ratification of international conventions banning the use of torture; asks the Council and the Commission to consider new and innovative ways to implement the Guidelines on Torture; emphasises that, although those Guidelines were adopted as long ago as 2001, they are among the least implemented; in view of the current threats facing the absolute prohibition of torture and ill-treatment in the international context of counter-terrorism; calls on the Council to associate Parliam ...[+++]ent in the future evaluation process of the Guidelines; in that connection, informs the Council that its sub-committee on Human Rights has asked for a study aimed at optimising the implementation of the EU Guidelines on Torture and improving the means provided for by those Guidelines; recommends to the Austrian and Finnish Presidencies that they conduct demarches on torture in all countries that are signatories to the relevant conventions but appear not to be cooperating; emphasises that the regular presence of the Presidency or the Council Secretariat in the relevant UN Committee on Torture could bring substantial material input into a strategic analysis of which countries to demarche at which point in time; asks the Council to consider whether the European Union could not act more forcefully and more convincingly vis-à-vis third countries if all Member States were to sign and ratify the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment ; is also concerned at the allegations of relocation and outsourcing of torture in third countries and calls on the EU to consider the fight against torture as a top priority of its human rights policy, in particular through enhanced implementation of the EU Guidelines and all other EU instruments such as the EIDHR;

83. Welcomes the commitment of the Austrian Presidency to continue the practice of demarches in respect of all of the EU's international partners regarding the ratification of international conventions banning the use of torture; asks the Council and the Commission to consider new and innovative ways to implement the Guidelines on Torture; emphasises that, although those Guidelines were adopted as long ago as 2001, they are among the least implemented; in view of the current threats facing the absolute prohibition of torture and ill-treatment in the international context of counter-terrorism; calls on the Council to associate Parliam ...[+++]ent in the future evaluation process of the Guidelines; in that connection, informs the Council that its sub-committee on Human Rights has asked for a study aimed at optimising the implementation of the EU Guidelines on Torture and improving the means provided for by those Guidelines; recommends to the Austrian and Finnish Presidencies that they conduct demarches on torture in all countries that are signatories to the relevant conventions but appear not to be cooperating; emphasises that the regular presence of the Presidency or the Council Secretariat in the relevant UN Committee on Torture could bring substantial material input into a strategic analysis of which countries to demarche at which point in time; asks the Council to consider whether the European Union could not act more forcefully and more convincingly vis-à-vis third countries if all Member States were to sign and ratify the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment ; is also concerned at the allegations of relocation and outsourcing of torture in third countries and calls on the EU to consider the fight against torture as a top priority of its human rights policy, in particular through enhanced implementation of the EU Guidelines and all other EU instruments such as the EIDHR;