Traduction de «committee which » (Anglais → Français) :

The EPA Committee is assisted in the performance of its duties by the Customs Cooperation Committee, which is established in accordance with Article 41 of Protocol 1 to the Agreement, and the Joint Development Committee, which is established in accordance with Article 52 of the Agreement.

‘Following a referral back to committee pursuant to paragraph 3, the lead committee must, before taking a decision on the procedure to be followed, allow an associated committee, as provided for in Rule 50, to make choices as to the amendments which fall within its exclusive competence, and in particular to choose which amendments are to be resubmitted in plenary.

The ECB supports the objective of greater consistency between the Commission decisions which established the ‘Lamfalussy’ Committees of Supervisors (Level 3 Committees), i.e. CEBS, the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) and the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) (8) and where applicable the Commission may also choose to take into account the specific comments in this opinion in relation to the draft decisions pertaining to the other two Level 3 Committees, on which the ECB is not consulted.

(Return tabled) Question No. 206 Mr. Alex Atamanenko: With respect to Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program entitlement, the appeals process and exclusion from entitlement to other federal agricultural programs: (a) are appellants entitled to know what recommendations are made by the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee and, if so, how is a copy of the recommendations obtained by the appellant; (b) are appellants entitled to know on what grounds the Intermediate Appeals Sub-Committee rejects recommendations of the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee ...[+++] and, if so, how is a copy of the recommendations obtained by the appellant; (c) has the CAIS administration ever issued rejection letters to an appellant before or after soliciting the involvement of an appeals committee and, if so, how is a copy of the motion or other directive permitting this obtained by the appellant; (d) who is responsible for forwarding recommendations made by the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee to the next level of appeal; (e) are there any legitimate grounds upon which the National CAIS Committee (NCC) administration is allowed to refuse an appellant the full extent of an appeal by neglecting to forward the recommendations of the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee to the next level of appeal; (f) does the appeal process deal with appeals on a case by case basis or can the NCC administration short-circuit the appeals process based on a judgment that an appellant's complaint is just like the one that may have preceded it; (g) are there guidelines established that would give an appellant a reasonable expectation of the time it should take to address an appeal at all the various levels and, if so, what are the guidelines that govern a reasonable expectation; (h) is the appellant justified in expecting that the decisions made by appeals committees will be communicated to the appellant; (i) what are the circumstances under which it would be accepta ...

Motions Pursuant to Standing Order 56.1, Mr. Boudria (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Ms. Copps (Minister of Canadian Heritage), moved, That Bill C-28, An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act, the Members of Parliament Retiring Allowances Act and the Salaries Act, shall be disposed of as follows: That the House proceed to the second reading stage of the said Bill immediately after Oral Questions on Tuesday, June 5, 2001, and, during this stage, no Member shall speak for more than ten minutes, and that no later than 15 minutes prior to the conclusion of Government Orders on that day, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage shall be put and any division necessary to dispose of ...[+++]the reading shall be taken forthwith; That immediately after Routine Proceedings on Wednesday, June 6, 2001, the Bill shall be referred to a Committee of the Whole, provided that (a) any Member may table an amendment which, if in order, the Chair shall put at the appropriate time, (b) after no more than one hour of consideration by the said Committee on clause 1, the Committee shall proceed to subsequent clauses, which shall be subject to debate and amendment, (c) any division requested in the committee shall be deferred until the end of the Committee's consideration of the Bill, and (d) no later than 15 minutes prior to the ordinary time of adjournment, all questions necessary to dispose of the committee stage and the report stage of the Bill shall be put and any division necessary be taken forthwith; and That after Oral Questions on Thursday, June 7, 2001, the House shall immediately proceed to the third reading stage of the said Bill, during which no Member shall speak for more than ten minutes, and that no later than 15 minutes prior to the conclusion of Government Orders on that day, all questions necessary for the disposal of the third reading stage shall be put and any division necessary to dispose of the reading shall be ...

(11) the fourth purpose of this Decision is to improve information to the public concerning committee procedures and therefore to make applicable to committees the principles and conditions on public access to documents applicable to the Commission, to provide for a list of all committees which assist the Commission in the exercise of implementing powers and for an annual report on the working of committees to be published as well as to provide for all references to documents related to committees which have been transmitted to the Eu ...[+++]ropean Parliament to be made public in a register;