Traduction de «Spearman s rank correlation » (Anglais → Français) :

(Return tabled) Question No. 130 Mr. Francis Scarpaleggia: With regard to rail safety in Canada: (a) for the period of 2006-2012, which railways were permitted to operate with a single operator; (b) for the period of 2006-2012, which railways had permission to leave trains unattended for limited periods of time on main lines with or without an idling locomotive(s); (c) for the period of 2006-2012, which railways had permission to leave trains unattended for limited periods of time on side lines with or without an idling locomotive(s); (d) with regard to the railways in (b) and (c), under what specific conditions could the trains be left unattended; (e) what legislative or regulatory framework governs local emergency preparedness plans i ...[+++]n the event of a rail accident; (f) with respect to the plans in (e), (i) who is responsible for creating and executing such plans, (ii) by whom are they audited, (iii) how often are they audited, (iv) against what criteria are they audited; (g) by whom and how often are municipalities through which freight trains pass provided with regular reports on (i) the state of local emergency preparedness in the event of a rail accident, (ii) the state and maintenance record of the railway lines within their borders, (iii) the materials, hazardous or not, that are transported through their jurisdiction; (h) if reports referred to in (g) are not provided, why not; (i) how many of the DOT-111 railway tank cars and the DOD-112 tank cars are in use in Canada, for each year since 2006; (j) for each year since 2006, how many rolling stock and track safety inspectors were employed at Transport Canada, broken down by (i) province of work, (ii) oversight responsibility; (k) for each year since 2006, how many rolling stock and track safety inspectors employed by Transport Canada were responsible for inspections in (i) the Greater Montreal Area, (ii) the municipality of Pointe-Claire (iii) the municipality of Beaconsfield, (iv) the municipality ...

11. Calls, in the interests of increasing transparency and fostering a better understanding of the Lisbon Strategy and its implementation, for the development of a common and coherent structure for NRPs, making for a better comparative analysis of the impact of the proposed actions at Member State level, as well as an open and constructive dialogue at European level on the progress achieved; supports the idea, in this respect, of establishing country-specific recommendations and a best practice ranking system on reform agendas in the different policy fields; calls on all national governments to publish and to communicate to the Commiss ...[+++]ion the text of the provisions when transposing EU directives: the so-called correlation tables;

11. Calls, in the interests of increasing transparency and fostering a better understanding of the Lisbon Strategy and its implementation, for the development of a common and coherent structure for NRPs, making for a better comparative analysis of the impact of the proposed actions at Member State level, as well as an open and constructive dialogue at European level on the progress achieved; supports the idea, in this respect, of establishing country-specific recommendations and a best practice ranking system on reform agendas in the different policy fields; calls on all national governments to publish and to communicate to the Commiss ...[+++]ion the text of the provisions when transposing EU directives: the so-called correlation tables;

74. Calls, in the interests of increasing transparency and fostering a better understanding of the Lisbon strategy and its implementation, for the development of a common and coherent structure for NRPs, making for a better comparative analysis of the impact of the proposed actions at Member State level, as well as an open and constructive dialogue at European level on the progress achieved; supports the idea, in this respect, of establishing country-specific recommendations and a best practice ranking system on reform agendas in the different policy fields; calls on the Member States to draw up ...[+++]correlation tables and to communicate them to the European Commission;

74. Calls, in the interests of increasing transparency and fostering a better understanding of the Lisbon strategy and its implementation, for the development of a common and coherent structure for NRPs, making for a better comparative analysis of the impact of the proposed actions at Member State level, as well as an open and constructive dialogue at European level on the progress achieved; supports the idea, in this respect, of establishing country-specific recommendations and a best practice ranking system on reform agendas in the different policy fields; calls on the Member States to draw up ...[+++]correlation tables and to communicate them to the European Commission;

According to Alvin deGruyer, in comments captured in a brief for the Vanier Institute, “Death is democratic, deferral is a privilege correlated with economic rank”.