Traduction de «competitive examination » (Anglais → Français) :

evaluate the quality of sport competitions | examine the quality standards in sport competitions | assess quality of competitions in sport | assess the quality of sport competitions

competitive entrance examination [ competitive examination ]

internal and external competitive examinations

Committee on Competitive Examinations

internal and external competitive examinations

analyse competition restrictions | check competition restrictions | examine competition restrictions | investigate competition restrictions

aeromedical examiner | aero-medical examiner | aviation medical examiner | civil aviation medical examiner | designated aviation medical examiner | medical examiner | AME [Abbr.] | CAME [Abbr.] | DAME [Abbr.] | ME [Abbr.]

eye examination methods | ophthalmological examination techniques | eye examination technique | ophthalmological examination methods

The obligation to state the reasons on which decisions of a selection board in a competition are based must therefore take account of the nature of the proceedings concerned, which, as a rule, involve at least two separate stages, the first being an examination of the applications in order to select the candidates admitted to the competition and the second being an examination of the abilities of the candidates for the posts to be filled in order to draw up a list of suitable candidates.

The obligation to state the reasons on which decisions of a selection board in a competition are based must take account of the nature of the proceedings concerned, which involve as a rule at least two separate stages, the first being an examination of the applications in order to select the candidates admitted to the competition and the second being an examination of the abilities of the candidates for the posts to be filled in order to draw up a list of suitable candidates.

Increase the independence, accountability and transparency of the justice system, including by fostering the constitutional protection of judges, appointing judges and prosecutors on the basis of competitive examinations, establishing merit-based performance evaluation for prosecutors and setting objective rules for allocation of cases to judges.

For the purposes of the present appeal, it must first be stated that the Civil Service Tribunal recalled that any decision relating to a specific individual which is taken under the Staff Regulations and adversely affects that person must state the reasons on which it is based, on the one hand, to enable the competent court to review the legality of the decision and, on the other, to provide the person concerned with the information necessary to allow him to ascertain whether or not the decision is well founded and to enable him to decide whether to bring an action. It added, however, referring to Case C‑254/95 P Parliament v Innamorati [1996] ECR I‑3423, paragraphs 24 to 28, that, as far as concerns decisions taken by a selection b ...[+++]oard in a competition, the obligation to state reasons must be reconciled with observance of the secrecy surrounding the proceedings of selection boards by virtue of Article 6 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations, secrecy which was instituted with a view to guaranteeing the independence of selection boards and the objectivity of their proceedings. Thus, observance of this secrecy precludes both disclosure of the attitudes adopted by individual members of selection boards and disclosure of any factors relating to individual or comparative assessments of candidates and that the obligation to state the reasons on which decisions of a selection board in a competition are based must take account of the nature of the proceedings concerned, which, at the stage of examination of the abilities of the candidates, are primarily comparative in character and accordingly covered by the secrecy inherent in those proceedings (paragraphs 30 and 31 of the judgment under appeal).