Traduction de «Autorité responsable de l'exploitation du système » (Français → Anglais) :

The purpose of the Joint Action is that in the event of a threat to the security of the European Union or of a Member State arising from the operation or use of the system, or in the event of a threat to the operation of the system, in particular as a result of an international crisis, the Council, acting unanimously, shall decide on the necessary instructions to the European GNSS Supervisory Authority (SA) and the concession holde ...[+++]r of the system.

This was the rationale underlying the creation of the five biannual financing programmes under Title VI that are due to end in December 2002 and that were – and still are – Grotius II, designed for legal practitioners, OISIN II, for Member State law enforcement authorities, STOP II, for those responsible for combating trade in human beings and the sexual exploitation of children, Hippocrates, in the field of crime prevention in general, and Falcone, for those responsible f ...[+++]or action to combat organised crime.

For the most part they have been concerned with incentives and exchanges, training and cooperation for persons in individual occupations: legal practitioners (GROTIUS II), law enforcement authorities (OISIN II), persons responsible for combating trade in human beings and the sexual exploitation of children (STOP II) and persons responsible for action to combat organised crime (FALCONE).

The Commission now considers that it should remain responsible for operation of the rapid alert system, with the Authority acting as a member of the network, so we are not able to accept Amendments Nos 15, 89, 94, 158, 159, 161, 162, 163 and 169.

The new legal provisions contained in Bill C-86 will place the commission on equal footing with provincial authorities as far as price setting is concerned and authorize it to operate the pooling system agreed on by the provinces for milk earmarked for interprovincial or international trade.

An instrument enabling the exchange of information between competition agencies, including business information, but with watertight guarantees with respect to the protection of their confidential nature; 2. So called "positive comity instrument", by which one competition agency can ask another to investigate and if necessary act against a practice that harms its substantial interests yet falls outside its jurisdiction, that would be binding in nature; 3. A set of appropriate substantive rules, with tougher disciplines as practices are considered to have more pronounced anticompetitive effects (i.e stronger rules against hard core cart ...[+++]els than against vertical restrictions); 4. A dispute settlement system subject to strict deadlines, whereby the complainant authority can seek redress within a relatively short period of time if the rules of the Agreement have not been respected. The Commission wants to launch a debate Without committing itself on the content of the report, the Commission considers that the questions raised deserve to be debated in depth within the Community institutions as well as with our principle partners.