Traduction de «Division de l'Afrique I » (Français → Anglais) :

Africa I Division

reduction division | reductional division | meiosis I

African organisation [ African intergovernmental organisation | African intergovernmental organization | African organization | African regional organisation | African regional organization | Organisation of Central Africa | Organisation of East Africa | Organisation of Southern Africa | Organisation of West Africa | Organization of Central Africa | Organization of East Africa | Organization of Southern Africa | Organization of West Africa ]

Central African Economic and Monetary Community [ CACEU | CAEMC | CAMU | Central African Customs and Economic Union | Central African Monetary Union | Economic and Monetary Community of Central Africa | Equatorial Customs Union | UDE | UEAC | Union of Central African States ]

Political Affairs Division II, Africa, Middle East

Division for Eastern and Southern Africa

Division for Eastern, Southern Africa and Latin America

Political Affairs Division II, Asia, Africa, Oceania, Latin America, Swiss Abroad

Fifth package of actions in the Horn of Africa under the EU Trust Fund for a total amount of €59 million approved in April 2017 Fourth package of actions in the Horn of Africa under the EU Trust Fund for a total package of €170 million approved in December 2016 Third package of actions in the Horn of Africa under the EU Trust Fund for a total package of €66.5 million approved in October 2016 Second package of actions in the Horn of Africa under the EU Trust Fund for a total package of €117 million approved in April 2016 First package of actionsin the Horn of Africa under the EU Trust Fund for a total amount of €253 million approved in De ...[+++]cember 2015

As we face common challenges, culture can help all of us, in Europe, Africa, Middle East, Asia, stand together to fight radicalisation and build an alliance of civilisations against those trying to divide us.

Recognises the critical contribution of the African Peace Facility in developing the triangular partnership between the UN, the EU and the AU; believes that this Facility provides both an entry point and a potential lever for creating a stronger partnership between the EU and the AU and has proved indispensable in allowing the AU, and through it the eight Regional Economic Communities (RECs), to plan and manage their operations; considers it vital that the EU institutions and Member States remain closely engaged if the Facility is to be fully utilised and that the AU demonstrate higher levels of efficiency and transparency in using the funds; takes the view that the APF should focus on structural support rather than just bankrolling Afri ...[+++]can forces’ pay; acknowledges that there are other funding mechanisms in use, but believes that given the Facility’s sole focus on Africa, as well as its clear goals, it is especially important with regard to PSOs in Africa; considers that Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) working on peace-building in Africa should be given the opportunity to contribute their views, as part of a more strategic engagement with CSOs on peace and security; remains concerned at the continuing problems of financing and political will on the part of African countries; notes the Council conclusions of 24 September 2012 which state that ‘funding, alternative to the funding from the EDF, will have to be considered’.

Underlines the need for a rapid African response to crisis, and identifies the key role in this of the African Standby Force (ASF); underlines the major contribution of the EU, through the African Peace Facility and the funding of the AU, allowing the AU to strengthen its capacity to provide a collective response to crises on the continent; encourages regional organisations, such as the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC), to increase their efforts in the area of rapid African responses to crises and to complement the efforts of the AU.