Translation of "LES FAITS Types de mises en liberté " (French → English) :

23. Underlines the importance of developing integrated border management which should ensure uniform, secure and high-quality external border control while facilitating legitimate travel across external borders and promoting mobility within the Schengen area; welcomes the recent entry into operation of the Schengen Information System II and calls on eu-LISA to ensure high-quality operational management of the new system; expects the new European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR) to be fully functional by the end of 2014 and believes it will be an efficient instrument which will contribute to the detection and prevention of, and the fight against, cross-border crime and irregular immigration, as well as to protecting migrants and sav ...[+++]ing their lives; stresses that the possible development of new IT systems in the area of migration and border management, such as the Smart Borders initiatives, should be carefully analysed, especially in the light of the principles of necessity and proportionality, and should eventually be developed only once the relevant legal instruments have been adopted; particularly welcomes the recent agreement reached on the Schengen Evaluation Mechanism and calls on the Commission to fulfil its new responsibilities in order to ensure a high level of compliance with the Schengen acquis throughout the Schengen area; stresses that the reintroduction of controls at internal borders should be an exceptional measure that may be used only as a last resort, taking into consideration not only the security aspects but also the impact on mobility and freedom of movement; highlights the fact that the migration of, and crossing of external borders by, a large number of third-country nationals should not, per se, be considered to be a threat to public policy or to internal security; reiterates its strong support for the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Schengen area and calls on the Council also to agree to their accession, as this will boost ...

(Return tabled) Question No. 361 Hon. Bob Rae: With regard to the projected impacts of Bill C-10, An Act to enact the Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act and to amend the State Immunity Act, the Criminal Code, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, the Youth Criminal Justice Act, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and other Acts, on the number of inmates and their conditions of incarceration: (a) does the government have an estimate of how many new inmates this Bill is likely to create, and, if so, what is it; (b) how many new federal inmates does the government expect will result from this Bill; (c) how many new provincial inmates does the government expect will result from this Bil ...[+++]l, and has the government shared this estimate with the provinces; (d) how many new young offenders does the government expect will result from this Bill and has the government shared this estimate with the provinces; (e) how many new inmates is CSC planning for as a direct result of this bill; (f) how will this Bill affect the federal incarceration rate of aboriginals, broken down geographically and by sex; (g) how will this Bill affect the provincial incarceration rate of aboriginals, broken down geographically and by sex; (h) how will this Bill affect the youth incarceration rate of aboriginals, broken down geographically and by sex; (i) what resources will be allocated to meet the unique needs of the aboriginal offenders, broken down geographically and by sex; (j) what resources will be allocated to meet the needs of the increased aboriginal offender population, broken down geographically and by sex; (k) how many new staff does CSC anticipate will need to be hired as a result of this Bill, broken down by job type; (l) has CSC planned for additional programming to accommodate the influx of new inmates resulting from this Bill, and, if so, how many new programming spaces will be created, broken down by type; (m) how is ...

I have just one regret, which I know is shared by many people in Parliament, particularly my fellow Members in the Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance. It is the fact that the implementation of a text with such a big impact on the freedoms of European citizens is not subject to the full jurisdictional control of the Court of Justice.

Mr. Myron Thompson (Wild Rose, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, I want to tell Canadians about a sterling record of incompetence of the justice system which released this offender on parole once and on mandatory release three times beginning in 1963: Six thefts, one B and E, one weapons possession, one attempted robbery, escaped custody, two auto thefts, one possession of dangerous weapon, one assault, one theft and then another escape, one car theft, one possession of dangerous weapon, parole violation, contributing to juveni ...[+++]le delinquency, theft and escape from custody, B and E, theft over $200, mandatory release and mandatory release violation, common assault, mandatory release and mandatory release violation, assault and theft under $200, indecent assault and failure to appear, forcible confinement and two counts of buggery, mandatory release and release violation.

Specifically, new paragraph 61(a.2) provides that regulations may prescribe the types of conditions the Immigration Division must impose with respect to the release of a “designated foreign national,” and new paragraph 61(a.1) continues to provide that regulations may prescribe the types of conditions that an officer, the Immigration Division or the Minister may impose with respect to the release of a person from detention.

Specifically, new section 61(a.2) provides that regulations may prescribe the types of conditions the Immigration Division must impose with respect to the release of a “designated foreign national,” and new section 61(a.1) continues to provide that regulations may prescribe the types of conditions that an officer, the Immigration Division or the Minister may impose with respect to the release of a person from detention.