Translation of "Méthodes et frais d'entretien des grands chemins " (French → English) :

9. The line party shall at all times wholly indemnify the other party owning, operating or having control over the railway across or along which, or the other line across or near which, the line party’s line is constructed, from and against all loss, cost, damage, injury and expense to which that other party may be put by reason of any damage or injury to persons or property caused by the construction, maintenance or operating of the line party’s line or any work herein provided for by the terms and provisions of the Regulations, as well as against any damage or injury resulting from the imprudence, neglect or want of skill of the employ ...[+++]ees or agents of the line party in connection with the construction, maintenance or operation of the line party’s line, unless the cause of such loss, cost, damage, injury or expense can be traced elsewhere.

9. The line party shall at all times wholly indemnify the other party owning, operating or having control over the railway across or along which, or the other line across or near which, the line party’s line is constructed, from and against all loss, cost, damage, injury and expense to which that other party may be put by reason of any damage or injury to persons or property caused by the construction, maintenance or operating of the line party’s line or any work herein provided for by the terms and provisions of the Regulations, as well as against any damage or injury resulting from the imprudence, neglect or want of skill of the employ ...[+++]ees or agents of the line party in connection with the construction, maintenance or operation of the line party’s line, unless the cause of such loss, cost, damage, injury or expense can be traced elsewhere.

(Return tabled) Question No. 130 Mr. Francis Scarpaleggia: With regard to rail safety in Canada: (a) for the period of 2006-2012, which railways were permitted to operate with a single operator; (b) for the period of 2006-2012, which railways had permission to leave trains unattended for limited periods of time on main lines with or without an idling locomotive(s); (c) for the period of 2006-2012, which railways had permission to leave trains unattende ...[+++]d for limited periods of time on side lines with or without an idling locomotive(s); (d) with regard to the railways in (b) and (c), under what specific conditions could the trains be left unattended; (e) what legislative or regulatory framework governs local emergency preparedness plans in the event of a rail accident; (f) with respect to the plans in (e), (i) who is responsible for creating and executing such plans, (ii) by whom are they audited, (iii) how often are they audited, (iv) against what criteria are they audited; (g) by whom and how often are municipalities through which freight trains pass provided with regular reports on (i) the state of local emergency preparedness in the event of a rail accident, (ii) the state and maintenance record of the railway lines within their borders, (iii) the materials, hazardous or not, that are transported through their jurisdiction; (h) if reports referred to in (g) are not provided, why not; (i) how many of the DOT-111 railway tank cars and the DOD-112 tank cars are in use in Canada, for each year since 2006; (j) for each year since 2006, how many rolling stock and track safety inspectors were employed at Transport Canada, broken down by (i) province of work, (ii) oversight responsibility; (k) for each year since 2006, how many rolling stock and track safety inspectors employed by Transport Canada were responsible for inspections in (i) the Greater Montreal Area, (ii) the municipality of Pointe-Claire (iii) the municipality of Beaconsfield, (iv) the municipality ...

29. Calls on the Secretary-General, with the assistance of DG INLO and all DGs to carry out a in-depth analysis of the actual use of Parliament's buildings and of the need for rules applicable to all categories of users and to develop, as a matter of priority, a single, reliable database containing all relevant information about all the persons accommodated in Parliament's buildings; observes that the Bureau decision on Parliament's medium- and long-term property policy constitutes a good starting point in this respect; calls on DG INLO to scrupulously implement the action plan agreed with the Internal Auditor; calls for a comparative analysis of capital, capital service and maintenance costs per square meter of office space occupied as ...[+++]against the current rental cost of office space in the ‘European district’ in Brussels; demands that, before any more office buildings are purchased, their value must be ascertained by means of discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis;