Traduction de «Omettre de poursuivre l'affaire » (Français → Anglais) :

8. A continued Union financial underpinning is needed to enable the Union to implement and further develop its Integrated Maritime Policy in line with the European Parliament Resolution of 20 May 2008 on the Integrated Maritime Policy[11] and to pursue its overarching objectives as set out in the Commission’s Blue Paper of October 2007, confirmed in the Progress Report of October 2009 and endorsed by the General Affairs Council conclusions of 16 November 2009.

4. On a reasoned application by a party or of its own motion, the Tribunal may omit the name of the applicant or of other persons mentioned in connection with the proceedings, or certain information, from the publications relating to a case if there are legitimate reasons for keeping the identity of a person or the information confidential.

- On policy issues related to Enron: noted that most of the regulatory issues highlighted by Enron are already being tackled in the context of the FSAP (International Accounting Standards, Regulatory Reporting) and welcomed further Commission work on auditor independence, priority for the EU auditing strategy, financial analysts and credit rating agencies.

- On policy issues related to Enron: noted that most of the regulatory issues highlighted by Enron are already being tackled in the context of the FSAP (International Accounting Standards, Regulatory Reporting) and welcomed further Commission work on auditor independence, priority for the EU auditing strategy, financial analysts and credit rating agencies.

In order to maintain the Court’s capacity, in the face of an ever-increasing caseload, to dispose within a reasonable period of time of the cases brought before it, it is also necessary to continue the efforts made to reduce the duration of proceedings before the Court, in particular by extending the opportunities for the Court to rule by reasoned order, simplifying the rules relating to the intervention of the States and institutions referred to in the first and third paragraphs of Article 40 of the Statute and providing for the Court to be able to rule without a hearing if it considers that it has sufficient information on the basis of ...[+++] all the written observations lodged in a case.

In order to maintain the Court’s capacity, in the face of an ever-increasing caseload, to dispose within a reasonable period of time of the cases brought before it, it is also necessary to continue the efforts made to reduce the duration of proceedings before the Court, in particular by extending the opportunities for the Court to rule by reasoned order, simplifying the rules relating to the intervention of the States and institutions referred to in the first and third paragraphs of Article 40 of the Statute and providing for the Court to be able to rule without a hearing if it considers that it has sufficient information on the basis of ...[+++] all the written observations lodged in a case.