Traduction de «Réseau principal d'entreprise » (Français → Anglais) :

2. Upon specific written request of an undertaking authorised to provide electronic communications networks, any network operator shall, subject to the availability of network capacity, have the obligation to meet all reasonable requests for access to its physical infrastructure under fair terms and conditions, including price, on condition that no problems will arise in connection with the security and safety of the network and bearing in mind the principle of reciprocity, in view of deploying elements of high-speed electronic communications networks.

The principles governing SOLVIT, the problem-solving network for citizens and business

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 2401_1 - EN - The principles governing SOLVIT, the problem-solving network for citizens and business

Following Commission Recommendation 2001/893/EC of 7 December 2001 on principles for using ‘SOLVIT’ – the Internal Market Problem Solving Network , SOLVIT was created as a network of centres set up by Member States within their own national administrations, as a fast and informal means of resolving problems individuals and businesses encounter when exercising their rights in the internal market.

In the Member States which border third countries, with the network whose track gauge is different from the main rail network within the Union and whose rail freight markets are dominated by the rail freight carriages to and from third countries, the licensing authorities when making decisions on the issue of licences to railway undertakings which are directly or indirectly effectively controlled through the ownership shares of third countries or nationals of third countries, may take into account the existence or non-existence of reciprocal access for Union rail undertakings to the rail freight market of the respective third country.

65. Stresses the role that corporate social responsibility plays by adhering to high environmental and social and labour standards abroad and applying best available technologies; believes these should be promoted through relevant fora such as the G8, G20, WTO, OECD, UNCTAD, UNEP and its International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management, the international metals study groups and other bodies; applauds, in this context, positive contributions through the UN's Global Compact; calls on EU companies to develop an appropriate code of conduct for those operating in third countries and to base their activities on the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises and ISO 2 ...[+++]6000; calls on the Commission to take measures which ensure compliance with social, environmental and labour standards by European companies mining natural resources in third countries; calls on the Commission to come forward with a proposal of its own on country-by-country reporting concerning conflict minerals and to establish legally binding requirements for extractive companies to publish their revenue payments for each project and country they invest in, following the example of the US Dodd-Frank bill; supports the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and the global network Publish What You Pay (PWYP); believes that these standards should, in particular, be applied to projects receiving EU funding, for example from the EIB; urges the EU to investigate how the importing of illegally traded or extracted minerals can be prevented; asks the Commission to investigate whether ‘fingerprinting’ technology could be used in this context and to promote pilot projects based on the experiences of the ‘coltan fingerprint’; calls on the EIB to undertake a regular analysis of the expected impacts of its lending in the extractive industry;