Traduction de «Utilisation d'informations a posteriori » (Français → Anglais) :

hindsight evidence [ retrospective evidence ]

hindsight evidence | retrospective evidence

a posteriori information

Information Processing - Data Interchange on 130 mm (5.25 in) Flexible Disk Cartridges Using Modified Frequency Modulation Recording at 7 958 ftprad, 1.9 tpmm (48tpi), on Both Sides - Part 2: Track Format A

Information Processing - Data Interchange on 130 mm (5.25 in) Flexible Disk Cartridges Using Modified Frequency Modulation Recording at 13 262 ftprad, on 80 Tracks on Each Side - Part 2: Track Format A for 77 Tracks

Community Rapid Information System | Community system for the rapid exchange of information on dangers arising from the use of consumer products | RAPEX alert system | Rapid Alert System for non-food dangerous products | RAPEX [Abbr.]

Community programme to stimulate the development of a European multimedia content industry and to encourage the use of multimedia content in the emerging information society | Multiannual Community programme to stimulate the development of a European multimedia content industry and to encourage the use of multimedia content in the emerging information society | INFO 2000 [Abbr.]

assess information services using metrics | rate information services using metrics | evaluate information service using metrics | evaluate information services using metrics

utilise meteorological data | utilise meteorological information | provide advice on operations using meteorological information | use meteorological information

On one occasion, the deputy director had to go before the court because the validity of the authorization was challenged. The court ruled, after the fact, that this authorization was indeed justified.

Are statistics collected systematically, after the fact, on the use made of each piece of equipment, meaning the operational readiness of a piece of equipment over a certain period of time?

(Return tabled) Question No. 199 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With regard to the development and operation of the Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Monitoring System (CMSMS) announced in March 2011: (a) what are the government's baseline assumptions for the CMSMS, (i) how many Canadians live with MS according to the government’s source, (ii) what is the government's source; (b) what have been the challenges in developing the system between March 2011 and today, (i) how has each challenge been overcome, (ii) what are the achievements to date, (iii) what milestones has the government planned between December 2013 and December 2015 and by what dates; (c) what is the cost of developing the system, broken down by costs to date; (d) how much money did the Can ...[+++]adian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) contribute to the development of the CMSMS, (i) were there any other partners involved in the development of the system, (ii) if so, who are they, (iii) what has each contributed; (e) who was involved in the design and development of the CMSMS, (i) from what departments/institutions were they, (ii) were potential conflicts of interest declared and, if so, how; (f) what health information does the CMSMS track, specifically, with regard to (i) chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI), (ii) impacts of CCSVI treatment, including but not limited to use of the following scales, Expanded Disability Status Scale, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale, and Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Inventory, (iii) pharmaceutical treatments for MS, (vi) adverse drug reactions by MS drug; (g) who is/was overseeing pilot testing, (i) who is/was responsible for ensuring that patient information is/was protected, (ii) who is/was responsible for the integrity of the results; (h) were ethical reviews for pilot testing necessary and, if so, on what date did each pilot site pass ethical review; (i) when is pilot testing expected to/did it take place and at which MS clinics ...

In its Report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Directive 2007/38/EC on the retrofitting of mirrors to heavy goods vehicles registered in the Community, the Commission outlined that most Member States had no detailed information on how many vehicles failed their roadworthiness test because they failed to comply with the retrofitting requirements.