Traduction de «Vol à droite de l'axe d'un corridor aérien » (Français → Anglais) :

For example, on a return Boston-to-Paris flight, an air traveller in the United States will pay a $5 security charge.

18. Emphasises the need to ensure consistency between the different legislations on air passenger rights and in particular between the legal protection for package travellers and the lack of similar protection for seat-only passengers, thus following travel market trends whereby consumers increasingly arrange their travel themselves and avoiding any discrimination against passengers based on type of ticket purchase or unfair competition between the different service providers (air carriers, travel agencies or tour operators); in particular, it urges the Commission to propose binding measures, including obligations for air ...[+++]carriers to provide for a final guarantee to cover liabilities of air carriers towards passengers, ensuring that passengers buying seat-only seats are equally effectively protected in case of airline insolvency, bankruptcy or removing of an operating licence as package travellers are already;

57. Calls on Turkey to commit itself to good neighbourly relations; reminds Turkey in this context that it should refrain from any threats against neighbouring countries (e.g. the "casus belli" threat against Greece concerning its right to determine the extent of its territorial waters), as well as from tension-prone military activities (e.g. continuous violations of the Athens Flight Information Region rules and of Greek national airspace) which also threaten air-navigation safety, affect good neighbourly relations and could negatively influence the accession process; calls on Turkey to engage in serious and intensive efforts for the resolution of outstanding disputes with all its neighbours, in accordance with the UN Charter and other r ...[+++]elevant international conventions; believes that, as stated in the Presidency conclusions of the Helsinki European Council of 10 and 11 December 1999 and in the short-term priorities of the Accession Partnership, failing a settlement, outstanding delimitation issues (e.g. delimitation of the Aegean sea continental shelf) should be brought before the ICJ, with a view to a final and compulsory settlement;

57. Calls on Turkey to commit itself to good neighbourly relations; reminds Turkey in this context that it should refrain from any threats against neighbouring countries (e.g. the "casus belli" threat against Greece concerning its right to determine the extent of its territorial waters), as well as from tension-prone military activities (e.g. continuous violations of the Athens Flight Information Region rules and of Greek national airspace) which also threaten air-navigation safety, affect good neighbourly relations and could negatively influence the accession process; calls on Turkey to engage in serious and intensive efforts for the resolution of outstanding disputes with all its neighbours, in accordance with the UN Charter and other r ...[+++]elevant international conventions; believes that, as stated in the Presidency conclusions of the Helsinki European Council of 10 and 11 December 1999 and in the short-term priorities of the Accession Partnership, failing a settlement, outstanding delimitation issues (e.g. delimitation of the Aegean sea continental shelf) should be brought before the ICJ, with a view to a final and compulsory settlement;

the operating air carrier notified to the passenger has been replaced by another operating air carrier which has been entered on the Community list and is subject to an operating ban which has led to the cancellation of the flight concerned, or which would have led to such cancellation if the flight concerned had been operated in the Community, the air carriage contractor which is party to the contract of carriage shall offer the passenger the right to reimbursement or re-routing provided ...[+++] for in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, provided that, where the flight has not been cancelled, the passenger has chosen not to take that flight.

It should be noted that existing section 27 already provides a general authority for the use of such force “as is reasonably necessary” to prevent the commission of certain offences, where there is a likelihood of immediate and serious injury to persons or property (6) The Department of Justice describes Clause 2 as a clarification of the law as it applies to Canadian aircraft in flight outside Canadian airspace, as well as a means of ensuring full effect to the Tokyo Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed On Board Aircraft (7)