Traduction de «attaquer l'arrêt » (Français → Anglais) :

to contest the judgment

Definition: The essential feature is recurrent attacks of severe anxiety (panic), which are not restricted to any particular situation or set of circumstances and are therefore unpredictable. As with other anxiety disorders, the dominant symptoms include sudden onset of palpitations, chest pain, choking sensations, dizziness, and feelings of unreality (depersonalization or derealization). There is often also a secondary fear of dying, losing control, or going mad. Panic disorder should not be given as the main diagnosis if the patient has a depressive disorder at the time the attacks start; in these circumstances the panic attacks are p ...[+++]robably secondary to depression. | Panic:attack | state

the contested judgement and the Porrini judgement clearly follow the same course in the case-law of the Court

saturation attack | saturation computer attack | denial of service attack | DOSA | distributed denial of service | DDOS | distributed denial-of-service attack

attacking player [ attacker | striker | attack | forward ]

man-in-the-middle attack | MITMA | MITM | MIM attack | bucket brigade attack

line | attacking line | offensive line | forward line

Definition: Fear of scrutiny by other people leading to avoidance of social situations. More pervasive social phobias are usually associated with low self-esteem and fear of criticism. They may present as a complaint of blushing, hand tremor, nausea, or urgency of micturition, the patient sometimes being convinced that one of these secondary manifestations of their anxiety is the primary problem. Symptoms may progress to panic attacks. | Anthropophobia Social neurosis

Definition: Hypersomnia is defined as a condition of either excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep attacks (not accounted for by an inadequate amount of sleep) or prolonged transition to the fully aroused state upon awakening. In the absence of an organic factor for the occurrence of hypersomnia, this condition is usually associated with mental disorders.

Error of law consisting in finding that there was an extension of the time limit laid down in paragraph 5 of point II. 22 of general conditions FP7 for the presentation of the final versions of audit reports 11-INFS-025 and 11-BA119-016 (paragraphs 93 and 95 of the judgment under appeal) and that the Commission did not breach the grant agreement (paragraph 97 of the judgment under appeal).

Error of law consisting in stating, as regard audit report 11-INFS-025, that Rose Vision ‘had not put forward any evidence capable of calling into question the findings in that audit report’ (paragraph 101 of the judgment under appeal) and that the Commission had not breached the grant agreement (paragraph 102 of the judgment under appeal).

Secondly, the Court’s reasons are contradictory, since it first applies the case-law on the selectivity of fiscal measures (paragraphs 51 and 53 of the judgment under appeal) and then finds that it is not relevant (paragraph 57 of the judgment under appeal).

In view of the fact that, as recognised in the judgment under appeal, the decision adopted by the Commission on 8 October 2010 does not contain any express reason for the requirement for the bank issuing the guarantee to have a credit rating, the judgment under appeal was incorrect in so far as it found that the contested measure was not vitiated by an inadequate statement of reasons, as claimed by the appellants in the proceedings before the General Court.