Traduction de «conditions d'inscription en courbe » (Français → Anglais) :

(Return tabled) Question No. 130 Mr. Francis Scarpaleggia: With regard to rail safety in Canada: (a) for the period of 2006-2012, which railways were permitted to operate with a single operator; (b) for the period of 2006-2012, which railways had permission to leave trains unattended for limited periods of time on main lines with or without an idling locomotive(s); (c) for the period of 2006-2012, which railways had permission to leave trains unattended for limited periods of time on side lines with or without an idling locomotive(s); (d) with regard to the railways in (b) and (c), under what specific conditions could the ...[+++] trains be left unattended; (e) what legislative or regulatory framework governs local emergency preparedness plans in the event of a rail accident; (f) with respect to the plans in (e), (i) who is responsible for creating and executing such plans, (ii) by whom are they audited, (iii) how often are they audited, (iv) against what criteria are they audited; (g) by whom and how often are municipalities through which freight trains pass provided with regular reports on (i) the state of local emergency preparedness in the event of a rail accident, (ii) the state and maintenance record of the railway lines within their borders, (iii) the materials, hazardous or not, that are transported through their jurisdiction; (h) if reports referred to in (g) are not provided, why not; (i) how many of the DOT-111 railway tank cars and the DOD-112 tank cars are in use in Canada, for each year since 2006; (j) for each year since 2006, how many rolling stock and track safety inspectors were employed at Transport Canada, broken down by (i) province of work, (ii) oversight responsibility; (k) for each year since 2006, how many rolling stock and track safety inspectors employed by Transport Canada were responsible for inspections in (i) the Greater Montreal Area, (ii) the municipality of Pointe-Claire (iii) the municipality of Beaconsfield, (iv) the municipality ...

(j) The EU should take action when registration requirements for religious or belief-related organisations unduly limit the freedom of religion or belief. Registration should not be understood as a prerequisite for the enjoyment of one’s human right to freedom of religion or belief, as that right cannot be conditional upon administrative or legal requirements; the EU should call for the abolishment of any legislation, such as the mandatory registration of one’s religion in civil status documents, if this legislation ...[+++] leads to discrimination against persons holding non-religious beliefs or persons who have changed their religion or belief;

(i) The EU should take action when registration requirements for religious or belief-related organisations unduly limit the freedom of religion or belief. Registration should not be understood as a prerequisite for the enjoyment of one’s human right to freedom of religion or belief, as that right cannot be conditional upon administrative or legal requirements; the EU should call for the abolishment of any legislation, such as the mandatory registration of one’s religion in civil status documents, if this legislation ...[+++] leads to discrimination against persons holding non-religious beliefs or persons who have changed their religion or belief;

The Commission shall adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 82, decisions on the inclusion of an active substance in Annex -I, including the conditions of the inclusion, the dates of inclusion and of expiry of inclusion, or on the non-inclusion of the active substance in Annex -I.

1. The Commission shall, on receipt of the opinion of the Agency referred to in Article 8(4), adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 82, a decision on the inclusion of the active substance in Annex -I, including the conditions of the inclusion, the dates of inclusion and of expiry of inclusion, or on the non-inclusion of the active substance in Annex I.

3. Each Member State shall ensure that a single record date applies to all companies; a Member State may, however, set one record date for companies that have issued bearer shares and another for companies that have issued registered shares, provided that a single record date applies to each company that has issued both types of shares.