Traduction de «l'autorité devrait » (Français → Anglais) :

Directive 2010/78/EU amending Directives 98/26/EC, 2002/87/EC, 2003/6/EC, 2003/41/EC, 2003/71/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2004/109/EC, 2005/60/EC, 2006/48/EC, 2006/49/EC and 2009/65/EC in respect of the powers of the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) and the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) | Omnibus I Directive

criminal justice authority | law enforcement authority | authority for the administration of criminal justice

authority responsible for the execution of sentences and measures | executive authority

Supervisory Board for Debt Collection and Bankruptcy

authority | regulatory authority

Natural death reportable to medicolegal authority

Hospital admission, by legal authority (commitment)

Any execution performed at the behest of the judiciary or ruling authority [whether permanent or temporary], such as:asphyxiation by gas | beheading, decapitation (by guillotine) | capital punishment | electrocution | hanging | poisoning | shooting

23. Takes note of the Court's conclusion in its special report No 5/2014 that overall, the Authority’s resources during its start-up phase were insufficient to allow it to fulfil its mandate; acknowledges that the ESFS is still in a setting-up phase and stresses that the tasks already entrusted to the Authority, as well as future tasks envisaged in on-going legislative work, require an adequate level of staff and budget to allow for high-quality supervision; emphasises that the need to combine additional tasks with additional resources should always be carefully considered; stresses, however, that any potential increases in its means should be preceded and/or complemented by adequate rationalisation efforts, wherever possible; highlight ...[+++]s the Authority’s coordinating role and the need to closely cooperate with national supervisory authorities to fulfil its mandate;

23. Takes note of the Court's conclusion in its special report No 5/2014 that overall, the Authority’s resources during its start-up phase were insufficient to allow it to fulfil its mandate; acknowledges that the ESFS is still in a setting-up phase and stresses that the tasks already entrusted to the Authority, as well as future tasks envisaged in on-going legislative work, require an adequate level of staff and budget to allow for high-quality supervision; emphasises that the need to combine additional tasks with additional resources should always be carefully considered; stresses, however, that any potential increases in its means should be preceded and/or complemented by adequate rationalisation efforts, wherever possible; highlight ...[+++]s the Authority’s coordinating role and the need to closely cooperate with national supervisory authorities to fulfil its mandate;

24. Stresses that given its limited resources, the Authority must stick to the tasks assigned to it by Parliament and the Council; underlines the fact that the Authority should carry out those assignments in full but that it must not seek to go beyond its mandate, and that it must remain independent; highlights the fact that the Authority should check the necessity of drafting guidelines and recommendations;

25. Highlights the fact that the Authority should make full use of the powers in the area of consumer protection that are granted to it by its mandate; underlines that in this area, the Authority should coordinate its action more closely with the other ESAs through the Joint Committee;