Traduction de «motif d'asile » (Français → Anglais) :

ground for asylum | ground for seeking asylum

hearing on the grounds for asylum | hearing

ground for denying asylum | ground for the exclusion of asylum | exclusion ground

political asylum [ diplomatic asylum | request for political asylum | territorial asylum(UNBIS) ]

refusal of asylum application | refusal of refugee status | rejection of asylum application

asylum shopping

country of first asylum [ first asylum country ]

substantiation of the grounds of opposition

right of asylum [ territorial asylum(UNBIS) ]

European Asylum Support Office [ EASO [acronym] ]

The pieces of legislation concerned focus on fairer, quicker and better quality asylum decisions (the Asylum Procedures Directive); ensuring that there are humane physical reception conditions (such as housing) for asylum seekers across the EU (the Reception Conditions Directive); and clarifying the grounds for granting international protection (the Qualification Directive).

73. Stresses the importance of a gender-sensitive asylum and migration policy, the recognition of the threat of genital mutilation as a reason for asylum, and the development of appropriate guidelines and coordination of best practice examples; emphasises in this connection the indispensability of an individual right to stay, as otherwise there is an imbalance of power, with particular reference to migrant women in cases of domestic violence; calls on the Commission to assess and identify specific actions that can ensure that women asylum-seekers’ rights are strengthened and fully respected throughout the asylum procedure;

In today’s judgment, the Court recalls, first of all, that a Member State is required not to transfer an asylum seeker to the Member State initially identified as responsible where systemic deficiencies in the asylum procedure and in the conditions for the reception of asylum seekers in the Member State initially identified as responsible provide substantial grounds for believing that the applicant would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment .

11. Asks for the suspension of Dublin II transfers when the rights of asylum seekers cannot be guaranteed, with reference to Italy, Greece and Malta; considers that the Dublin II Regulation, which governs the allocation of responsibility for asylum applications, places a disproportionate burden on those Member States constituting entry points into the EU, and does not provide for a fair distribution of asylum responsibility among the Member States; notes that the Dublin II system, as it has been applied so far, in a context characterised by very different asylum systems and insufficient levels of asylum acquis implementation, has led to the unequal treatment of asylum seekers while ...[+++] also having an adverse impact on family reunification and integration; stresses, moreover, its shortcomings in terms of efficiency and cost-effectiveness, since more than half of agreed transfers never take place and there are still significant numbers of multiple applications; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that asylum seekers who are returned to a Member State on the basis of the Dublin II Regulation are not discriminated against for the sole reason that they are Dublin II transferees;