Traduction de «obligation de répercussion de l'impôt » (Français → Anglais) :

152.29 If any payment is made by a person to the Minister of National Revenue on account of taxes specified in section 228 of the Income Tax Act and of a premium under this Part in respect of self-employed earnings, despite any direction made by the person making the payment with respect to its application, the part of the payment that would be applied under that section in payment of tax under the Income Tax Act is, subject to section 37 of the Canada Pension Plan, to be applied in payment of a premium under this Part and is deemed to be a payment on account of the premium, and to the extent of the amount so applied, does not discharge ...[+++]liability for tax under the Income Tax Act, and any amount then remaining is to be applied in payment of tax under the Income Tax Act and discharges the liability of the person making the payment for that tax to the extent of that amount.

152.29 If any payment is made by a person to the Minister of National Revenue on account of taxes specified in section 228 of the Income Tax Act and of a premium under this Part in respect of self-employed earnings, despite any direction made by the person making the payment with respect to its application, the part of the payment that would be applied under that section in payment of tax under the Income Tax Act is, subject to section 37 of the Canada Pension Plan, to be applied in payment of a premium under this Part and is deemed to be a payment on account of the premium, and to the extent of the amount so applied, does not discharge ...[+++]liability for tax under the Income Tax Act, and any amount then remaining is to be applied in payment of tax under the Income Tax Act and discharges the liability of the person making the payment for that tax to the extent of that amount.

Taking comparable taxable bonds, a difficult task for sure, less than one-half of the tax exemption benefited municipalities, with respect to provincial tax-exempt municipal bonds issued in Ontario.

I wanted to talk about railroads too, and particularly about the graph indicating the effect of taxes on CN and CP, graph F. I'd like to understand more about this because, although we're suggesting that the fuel tax component in Canada versus that in the U.S. is very substantially higher—that's one of the arguments—I'm looking at the rest of the graph and I'm finding that there's a significant difference in the property tax component in Canada versus that in the U.S., and an astounding, very significant difference in the employment taxes in Canada versus those in the U.S. In fact, if I look at the percentages, 30% of the burden in Canad ...[+++]a is payroll taxes, whereas in the U.S. it's 67%.

The jobs and economic growth act would accomplish that objective by bringing forward a range of economic measures to contribute to Canada's advantage now and for the future, for example, by: eliminating tariffs on manufacturing inputs and machinery and equipment; eliminating the need for tax reporting under section 116 of the Income Tax Act for many investments; narrowing the definition of taxable Canadian property; implementing important changes to strengthen federally regulated private pension plans; implementing the one time transfer protection payment to provincial governments announced in December 2009; regulating national payment card networks and their operators, if necessary; enabling credit unions to incorporate federally and ...[+++] operate as banks; making it easier for companies to offer telecommunication services to Canadians; stimulating the mining industry by extending the mineral exploration tax credit; creating greater tax fairness between single and two parent families with respect to claiming universal child care benefit amounts; implementing an enhanced stamping regime for tobacco products to deter contraband.

The Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, where provisions or reserves properly constituted by the transferring company are partly or wholly exempt from tax and are not derived from permanent establishments abroad, such provisions or reserves may be carried over, with the same tax exemption, by the permanent establishments of the receiving company which are situated in the Member State of the transferring company, the receiving company thereby assuming the rights and obligations of the transferring company.