Traduction de «ordonnance sur la protection d'urgence » (Français → Anglais) :

to ensure that nothing will prevent the EU and its Member States from maintaining, improving and applying labour and social regulations, collective agreements and legislation on the entry of natural persons into, or temporary stay in, the EU’s or a Member State’s territory, including those measures necessary to ensure the orderly movements of natural persons across its borders such as, inter alia, admission or conditions for admission for entry; to guarantee, in line with Directive 96/71/EC on the posting of workers, that the minimum terms and conditions of employment of the host country are applicable to any service suppliers accessing the EU, today and in ...[+++] the future; to ensure that all workers coming into Europe, irrespective of their home country, enjoy the same labour rights as nationals in their host country and that the principle of equal pay for equal work is respected; to ensure that the eight fundamental International Labour Organisation (ILO) Conventions are ratified and effectively implemented by TiSA parties; to call on all parties to ratify and implement the principal ILO standards and to promote other relevant ILO Conventions and UN resolutions; to ensure that the EU’s and Member States’ labour laws and collective agreements are respected within the EU’s territory; to strengthen the EU monitoring and enforcement mechanism in order to deter infringements; to urge Member States to increase the resources available to labour inspectorates; to urgently collate and present detailed information on the number and type of service providers currently operating in the EU under Mode 4, including the duration of their stay; to ensure much more efficient cross-border access to data within the EU in the future; to include a safety clause preventing companies from circumventing or undermining the right to take industrial action through the use of workers from third countries during negotiations on collective agreements and labour disputes, and to allow TiSA ...

To challenge an account preservation order as it applies across the EU the debtor should have to seek a review from the court which issued the order, but to ensure protection of individuals, who may live and hold accounts in more than one Member State, they should be able to challenge the implementation of an order in the courts of any Member State where they hold accounts as regards the orders implementation in that Member State.

S. whereas by means of Prime Ministerial Order No 3676 of 30 May 2008 the Italian Government adopted urgent measures to address the state of emergency existing in relation to nomad community settlements,

Dangerous substances and preparations covered by Government Emergency Ordinance No. 200/2000 on the classification, labelling and packaging of dangerous substances and preparations, approved by Law No. 451/2001, as well as by Government Decision No. 490/2002 for the approval of Methodological Norms for the application of Government Ordinance No. 200/2000, and by Government Decision No. 92/2003 for the approval of the methodological norms on the classification, labelling and packaging of dangerous subst ...[+++]ances and preparations’.

5. Acknowledges that, in keeping with its request, emergency ordinances have been used only in the "exceptional circumstances" provided for in the Romanian Constitution, but regrets that, in reality, reliance on this type of practice has not decreased; repeats its call for the Romanian Government to refrain from resorting to emergency ordinances and to employ ordinary legislative procedures; calls for a clearer and more explicit definition of what is meant by "exceptional circumstances" in t ...[+++]he context of emergency ordinances;

5. Acknowledges that, in keeping with its request, emergency ordinances have been used only in the ‘exceptional circumstances’ provided for in the Constitution, but regrets that, in reality, reliance on this type of practice has not decreased; repeats its call for the Romanian Government to refrain from resorting to emergency ordinances and to employ ordinary legislative procedures; calls for a clearer and more explicit definition of what is meant by ‘exceptional circumstances’ in the context of emergency ...[+++] ordinances;