Traduction de «politique d'admissibilité au transport adapté » (Français → Anglais) :

16. Requests, by 2015, a proposal on urban mobility in which, in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, support for projects is made conditional on the submission by local authorities of sustainable mobility plans for efficient passenger and goods logistics chains in urban and built-up areas which contribute to a reduction in traffic volumes, accidents, atmospheric pollution and noise, comply with the standards and targets of European transport policy, fit in with the needs of surrounding towns and regions and do not create new market barriers; proposes an exchange of best practices in the area of innovation and research into susta ...[+++]inable concepts for urban mobility;

16. Requests, by 2015, a proposal on urban mobility in which, in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, support for projects is made conditional on the submission by local authorities of sustainable mobility plans for efficient passenger and goods logistics chains in urban and built-up areas which contribute to a reduction in traffic volumes, accidents, atmospheric pollution and noise, comply with the standards and targets of European transport policy, fit in with the needs of surrounding towns and regions and do not create new market barriers; proposes an exchange of best practices in the area of innovation and research into susta ...[+++]inable concepts for urban mobility;

3. Calls on the Commission to propose, as part of its second revision of the financial rules for EU-funded programmes, new approaches to transport funding and investments as well as innovative integrated funding instruments related to climate change adaptation, which are crucial to the success of EU transport policies;

At the same time, however, several of the EU’s policies and programmes in the field of transport, which have been launched in the wake of the White Paper on European Transport Policy, could well encourage businesses to make changes to their logistics chains. They include:

Among other things, he called for structural changes to the Broadcasting Act; a revision of the CRTC’s 1999 Television Policy to bring back mandatory minimum spending on programming by conventional broadcasters; an increase in tax credits to 30% of eligible spending by producers; a $95 million per year increase in the government’s contribution to the Canadian Television Fund; and adjustment of the eligibility criteria for the Canadian Television Fund to raise the level of broadcasters’ investments in programs that receive funding from that fund.

In their October 11, 2002, letter to the Minister of Transport, the Honourable David Collenette, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce clearly stated their three recommendations: one, that the federal government commit to a level of capital and maintenance to invest in a highway infrastructure that is more commensurate with Canada's status as a leader among developed nations; two, that the federal government commit to achieving funding agreements and partnerships with the provinces and territories to ensure that a national highway policy is established for Canada by December 2003; and third, that the federal government identify clear and ra ...[+++]tional criteria for determining inclusion and eligibility for funding under the national highway policy, both for existing fundamental highways and for the addition of key roadways and corridors in each province and territory.