Traduction de «éléments de l'appareil de Golgi » (Français → Anglais) :

138. Within such limits of repeatability as may be required by these Regulations or by specifications established by the Minister, a machine shall be capable of repeating its registrations for each identical load or quantity delivered regardless of repeated manipulations of any or all of the elements of the machine in a manner approximating normal conditions of use of the machine.

With regard to the selling of up to ten Challenger 600-1A11 aircraft by the Department of National Defence through the brokerage services of Lancaster Aviation Inc.: (a) what is current market value for a Challenger 600-1A11 airplane; (b) how many Challengers were sold by Lancaster Aviation Inc.; (c) what was the selling price of each Challenger; (d) what was the value of the cheque paid to Lancaster Aviation Inc. by the federal government for the commission on the Challenger sale; (e) what was the value of the cheque the Government of Canada paid to Lancaster Aviation Inc. to cover any expenses Lancaster may have incurred while trying to find buyers for the airplanes; (f) when was the Challenger contract advertised in Government Busin ...[+++]ess Opportunities magazine; (g) how many companies bid on the Challenger contract when if was advertised in Government Business Opportunities magazine; (h) how many points did Lancaster Aviation Inc. receive in each section of the proposal evaluation and contractor selection criteria for the Challenger contract; and (i) what criteria made the Lancaster Aviation Inc. bid the best overall proposal?

5. Manufacturers shall ensure that apparatus which they have placed on the market bear a type, batch or serial number or other element allowing their identification, or, where the size or nature of the apparatus does not allow it, that the required information is provided on the packaging or in a document accompanying the apparatus.

Question No. 848 Hon. Stéphane Dion: With regard the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program, since the beginning of Canada’s participation: (a) what was the first evaluation of the acquisition cost-per-plane Canada would pay, (i) when was that evaluation made, (ii) based on what information was it made, (iii) who provided the government with that information, (iv) via what medium (e.g., conference, personal discussion,briefing note, etc.), (v) what is the name of the government document containing that evaluation, (vi) what is the topic of that document, (vii) which government members were provided with information; (b) for every subsequent ...[+++] re-evaluation of the acquisition cost-per-plane that Canada would pay and up to the government's current evaluation, (i) what was the new evaluation (ii) when was that evaluation made, (iii) based on what information was it made, (iv) who provided the government with that information, (v) via what medium (e.g., conference, personal discussion, briefing note, etc.), (vi) what is the name of the government document containing that evaluation, (vii) what is the topic of that document, (viii) which government members were provided with that information, (ix) as precisely as possible, what new information prompted the re-evaluation; (c) what was the first evaluation of the maintenance and repair cost-per-plane Canada would have to incur, (i) when was that evaluation made, (ii) based on what information was it made, (iii) who provided the government with that information, (iv) via what medium (e.g., conference, personal discussion, briefing note, etc.), (v) what is the name of the government document containing that evaluation, (vi) what is the topic of that document, (vii) which government members were provided with that information; (d) for every subsequent re-evaluation of the maintenance and repair cost-per-plane that Canada would have to incur and up to the government's current evaluation, (i) what was the new evaluation, (ii) when ...

For gases, vapours, mist or dust, the type of protective equipment to be used shall be specified based on the hazard and potential for exposure, including air-purifying respirators, specifying the proper purifying element (cartridge or canister), the adequate particulate filters and the adequate masks, or self-contained breathing apparatus.

The principal features of the Directive are as follows: - within three years the Member States will draw up plans for the decontamination and/or disposal of the equipment inventoried that contains PCB and outlines for the collection and disposal of equipment not subject to inventory; those plans and outlines are to be communicated to the Commission; - the final date for the decontamination and/or disposal of equipment containing PCB that is subject to inventory is the end of 2010 except for certain transformers containing between 50 and 500 ppm (parts per million) of PCB, which may remain in service until the end of their useful lives; - the volume of PCB ...[+++] to be taken into account for the purposes of the preparation of the inventory is more than 5 dm3.