Translation of "évaluation critérielle " (French → English) :

criterion-referenced evaluation [ criterion-referenced assessment ]

criterium-referenced test

criterion-referenced test [ CRT | objectives-based test | objective-referenced test | objective referenced test | criterium-referenced test ]

criterion-referenced measurement [ criterion-referenced measure ]

technology assessment [ European Parliament Office for Scientific and Technological Options Assessment | Scientific and Technical Options Assessment | STOA | technological evaluation ]

project evaluation [ project appraisal | programme evaluation(UNBIS) ]

criterion referenced

evaluation method [ evaluation | Evaluation techniques(AGROVOC) | Evaluation(ECLAS) | Evaluation techniques(ECLAS) ]

lower of cost or market value | LOCOM [Abbr.]

8. Commends the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of oil exploration/ exploitation in the Northern Albertine Rift region, including in the VNP; considers that, on the basis of that assessment, the governments concerned, including the DRC Government, should be able to take informed decisions based on proper analysis of the impact of oil exploration and exploitation; regrets, however, that the SEA process has been greatly delayed and that oil exploration has already started in the VNP, even though the SEA process has not yet been finalised;

11. Stresses the importance of strengthening women’s role in conflict prevention and in promoting human rights and democratic reform, and of supporting the systematic participation of women as a vital component of the peace process and post-conflict reconstruction through more effective consultation and coordination with civil society and EU institutions, so as to ensure more accurate and systematic impact assessments in the field of human rights; objects to any legislation, regulation or government pressure that unduly curtails freedom of expression, especially that of women and LGBTI;

29. Calls on the Member States to support the creation of an independent European Arms Control Authority (EACA) under the auspices of the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy; considers that such an authority should be empowered to issue an opinion to Member States planning to grant a licence which has been denied by another Member State or States; considers that this advice should consist of an independent assessment of the applicability of the eight common criteria; further considers that such advice could also be asked for by states with a view to assessing the applicability of the eight co ...[+++]mmon criteria to any European export licence;

8. Recalls the primary importance of the principle of Policy Coherence for Development; urges the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to ensure that human rights are genuinely protected in the remit of any agreements concluded or revised with developing countries, through binding human rights clauses; recommends a procedure for consultation between the parties, detailing the political and legal mechanisms to be used in the event of a request for bilateral cooperation to be suspended, but also a warning mechanism and process for descriptive and evaluation purposes; insists that the Commission conduct systematic human rights impac ...[+++]t assessments of trade and investment agreements to help ensure effective enforcement of human rights; urges that the genuine enforcement of GSP Plus be implemented alongside a suitable transparent reporting mechanism and funding for civil society monitoring; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to support legal frameworks and initiatives aimed at transparency and good governance of mining and other resource sectors;

2. Notes that the Irish authorities submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF on 19 June 2015, and that its assessment was finalised by the Commission on 6 November 2015; welcomes the speedy evaluation period of less than five months;

4. Calls on the Commission to assess, after the entry into force of the new Europol Regulation (2013/0091(COD)), the provisions contained in the cooperation agreement, in particular on data protection; calls on the Commission to inform the Parliament and the Council of the outcome of this assessment and, if appropriate, to submit a recommendation for an authorisation to open international renegotiation of the agreement;

41. Underlines strongly the importance of systematically assessing the implementation of the EU Guidelines on Human Rights, including the implementation of the EU Guidelines for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of the Child, by using well-defined benchmarks; considers that, in order to ensure proper implementation of the Guidelines, further measures aimed at raising awareness of their content among EEAS and EU Delegation staff and Member State representations abroad must be taken; reiterates its call for civil society and human rights organisations to be more actively involved in the selection, development, evaluation and review of the G ...[+++]uidelines;

8. Underlines that the WHS is also an opportunity for all stakeholders to reflect on the vital need for UN reform towards an inclusive, transparent and effective coordination system, with a more inclusive and operative IASC, with better engagement with partners to enhance complementarity and with the full operationalisation of the Transformative Agenda, and to strengthen the multilateral humanitarian architecture for all crisis by establishing a reliable system of needs assessments serving as a basis for joint appeals (ensuring comprehensive financial tracking), a system of cost comparison between agencies and a monitoring and evaluation mechanism;

16. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take all the appropriate measures to make the SEA project a real decision-making tool;

7. Stresses that the European Fiscal Board, as the advisory board of the Commission, should be accountable to Parliament and that, in this context, its assessments should be public and transparent;