Translation of "fait en litige " (French → English) :

fact in dispute | fact in issue | factum probandum

fact in issue

fact in issue

contested points of law or of fact

fact relevant to an issue

examination upon articulated facts [ interrogatory upon articulated facts ]

joint statement of facts and issue

Definition: A disorder characterized by impairment of memory, learning difficulties, and reduced ability to concentrate on a task for more than brief periods. There is often a marked feeling of mental fatigue when mental tasks are attempted, and new learning is found to be subjectively difficult even when objectively successful. None of these symptoms is so severe that a diagnosis of either dementia (F00-F03) or delirium (F05.-) can be made. This diagnosis should be made only in association with a specified physical disorder, and should not be made in the presence of any of the mental or behavioural disorders classif ...[+++]ied to F10-F99. The disorder may precede, accompany, or follow a wide variety of infections and physical disorders, both cerebral and systemic, but direct evidence of cerebral involvement is not necessarily present. It can be differentiated from postencephalitic syndrome (F07.1) and postconcussional syndrome (F07.2) by its different etiology, more restricted range of generally milder symptoms, and usually shorter duration.

evidence-based medicine | EBM | evidence-based medical practice

financial litigation support | litigation support

In fact, this controversy is evidenced in most of the consultas of the DGT and TEAC resolutions.

(a) produced evidence that reasonable men might consider has proved the fact in issue to the extent that is required to be proved by that party; or

Given what has already been taken out of my Bill C-472 with respect to interim orders and the safeguards you referred to in Bill C-472, are you of the belief now that concerns raised by individuals, that this would amount to strategic litigation, are in fact valid, or that the proposal you have before us would ensure private actions taken before the tribunal will be bona fide and not frivolous and vexatious strategic litigation?

Where a disputing Party considers that a panellist is in violation of the Code of Conduct or does not fulfil the requirements set out in Article 325 and for this reason should be replaced, this Party may request the removal of the panellist by notifying the other disputing Party within 10 days from the time at which it came to know of the circumstances underlying the panellist's material violation of the Code of Conduct.