Translation of "partage judiciaire " (French → English) :

judicial partition | partition by court order

judicial partition [ partition by court order ]

Definition: A delusional disorder shared by two or more people with close emotional links. Only one of the people suffers from a genuine psychotic disorder; the delusions are induced in the other(s) and usually disappear when the people are separated. | Folie à deux Induced:paranoid disorder | psychotic disorder

crime reporter | forensic journalist | crime and defence correspondent | crime journalist

tied-vote [ equality of votes | tie-vote | tie ]

cost-sharing arrangement [ cost-sharing agreement | cost-shared agreement ]

P2P file sharing | Peer-to-peer file sharing

Arrest Child custody or support proceedings Litigation Prosecution

Any execution performed at the behest of the judiciary or ruling authority [whether permanent or temporary], such as:asphyxiation by gas | beheading, decapitation (by guillotine) | capital punishment | electrocution | hanging | poisoning | shooting

1. The Network shall maintain relations and share experience and best practice with the other European networks that share its objectives, such as the European Judicial Network in criminal matters.

The contact points facilitate judicial cooperation between EU countries, particularly in actions to combat serious crime, and enable appropriate communication and information sharing with contact points and judicial authorities in other EU countries.

Underlines that sharing of data and information can be a valuable tool in the international fight against terrorism and related crime, but stresses that the sharing of personal data must take place within a proper legal framework with clear rules and conditions, ensuring adequate protection of the privacy and civil liberties of individual citizens and providing for mechanisms for obtaining redress where necessary, and that such data sharing should be based on a binding international agreement with the full involvement of Parliament and the US Congress; stresses that the necessary data exchange should be in accordance with the existing EU-US agreement on extradition and mutual legal assistance, should comply with EC and EU data protection l ...[+++]egislation and should be accompanied by coordination between intelligence and law enforcement agencies, including, where appropriate, at operational level, and by judicial cooperation under the EU-US agreement on extradition and mutual legal assistance;

8. Recognises that the sharing of data and information is a valuable tool in the international fight against terrorism and related crime, but stresses that strong data protection guarantees would facilitate data sharing while ensuring protection of privacy, and that such data sharing would in any case need to be based on one or more international agreements similar in structure to the EC/US agreement on judicial cooperation in criminal matters and extradition, which is currently being examined by Congress;