Traduction de «procédures d'authentification » (Français → Anglais) :

To coordinate the implementation of the authentication procedures, the details of testing and training requirements for coin authentication, the specifications for checking euro coins unfit for circulation and other practical implementation provisions should be further determined by the European Technical and Scientific Centre (ETSC) established by Commission Decision 2005/37/EC (5), after having consulted the counterfeit coin experts group referred to in that Decision.

ACTIONS The Commission will: Key Action 16: Propose by 2012 a Council and Parliament Decision to ensure mutual recognition of e-identification and e-authentication across the EU based on online 'authentication services' to be offered in all Member States (which may use the most appropriate official citizen documents – issued by the public or the private sector); Other actions: Support seamless cross-border eGovernment services in the single market through the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP) and Interoperability Solutions for European Public Administrations (ISA) Programme; Review by 2011 the Public access to Environmenta ...[+++]l Information Directive; [62] Work with Member States and stakeholders to implement cross-border eEnvironment services, notably advanced sensor networks; Define by 2011 concrete steps in a White Paper on how to inter-connect e-procurement capacity across the single market; Lead by example on open and transparent eGovernment by creating in 2010 and implementing an ambitious eCommission 2011-2015 action plan, including full electronic procurement.

This includes the implementation of seamless eProcurement as well as practical e-identification and e-authentication cross border services (including mutual recognition of security levels for authentication)[61].

These would include: payment items acceptable for exchange, clearing or settlement; standards and procedures regarding these; settlements and related matters; authenticity and integrity of payment items and messages; and the identification and authentication of members and other persons.

The various pleas by the applicants alleging defects of form and procedure fall into four main categories. First, they challenge the Commission's appreciation of the scope of the judgment of 15 June 1994 annulling the 1988 decision and the consequences it drew therefrom. They then maintain that there were irregularities in the adoption and authentication of the Decision. They also argue that the procedure prior to the adoption of the 1988 decision is vitiated by irregularities. Finally, they argue that insufficient reasons were stated ...[+++] for the Decision in relation to certain questions falling within the three preceding categories. The Court rejects all those pleas.

Furthermore, some of the recent examinations have sought to limit the concept of client recognition, requiring re- identification upon every transaction rather than relying on security measures that are fairly industry-standard such as tokens.