Translation of "translation of programmation point par point " (French → English) :

(Return tabled) Question No. 847 Hon. Stéphane Dion: With regard to shoreline erosion: (a) what are all the studies undertaken, ordered or consulted by the government since 2000 to study or take under advisement the problem of eroding shorelines along the St Lawrence River; (b) for each of the studies referred to in (a), (i) who ordered it, (ii) who carried it out, (iii) when was it ordered and when was it delivered, (iv) what stakeholders, e.g., mayors, regional groups of elected officials, companies, lobbyists, etc., were consulted during its preparation, (v) to whom was it submitted; (c) for each of the studies ...[+++]referred to in (a), (i) what suggestions and recommendations were made in it, (ii) which of these suggestions and recommendations have been adopted by the government, (iii) what are the government programs dedicated to implementing the suggestions and recommendations identified in point (c)(ii), (iv) which suggestions and recommendations identified in point (c)(i) were rejected and why; (d) since 2006, for each fiscal year and for each riding bordering the St Lawrence, as well as for all ridings affected by shoreline erosion on the East Coast, identifying the federal program from which the funding came and listing the amounts by riding, by year, by program, by riding-and-year, by riding-and-program, by year-and-program and by riding-year and program, where possible, (i) how much did the federal government spend in that riding during the given year on the suggestions and recommendations identified in point (c)(ii), (ii) how much in total did the federal government spend in that riding during the given year to combat shoreline erosion; (e) how does the government explain differences between the answers to points (d)(i) and (d)(ii); (f) what studies are currently underway to enable the government to monitor the problem of the St Lawrence’s eroding shorelines?

32. Underlines that for the Structural Fund programming period 2000-2006 reporting by the Member States and the Commission of irregularities has to be strengthened; the action plan adopted by the Commission has to be closely monitored; a new reporting scheme on figures with definitions of their meaning and a classification of irregularities has to be worked out; this scheme and reporting has to be applied for the new programming ...[+++] period 2007-2013; the Commission made a firm commitment to work with the Member States on these issues and also with all the DGs dealing with recoveries in order to bring forward a unified reporting scheme on irregularities and recoveries; underlines that it will be an important point for the discharge in 2009;

(10) The Tampere European Council of 15 and 16 October 1999 determined in Conclusion 30 thereof that alternative, extra-judicial procedures should be created by the Member States and in conclusion 32 that national programmes should be set up to finance measures, public and non-governmental, for assistance to and protection of victims.

(10) The Tampere European Council of 15 and 16 October 1999 determined in the Conclusion 30 that alternative, extra‑judicial procedures should be created by the Member States and in conclusion 32 that national programmes should be set up to finance measures, public and non-governmental, for assistance to and protection of victims.

The AOSIS protocol proposal and the German delegation's suggestions will as well as others form part of the negotiations (c) Report of the ad hoc group to the second Conference of the Parties on the state of negotiations on the protocol; completion of the negotiations six months before the third Conference of the Parties in order to allow adoption during that Conference (d) Inclusion in the ad hoc group's working programme, in cooperation with the other subsidiary bodies, of an analysis or assessment to identify potential and possibl ...[+++]e policies and measures for achieving limitations and progressive reductions of greenhouse gas emissions (e) Consideration of the following key elements for inclusion in the protocol: (i) comprehensiveness of the protocol, covering all greenhouse gases, their sources and sinks and all relevant sectors; (ii) common but differentiated responsibilities of Parties in line with their respective capabilities and possibilities: - lead responsibility of Annex I Parties through specific commitments, individually or jointly, strengthening and enlarging those undertaken in Article 4(2)(a) and (b) of the Convention, - participation, over time, of non-Annex I Parties as recognized in Article 4(2)(f) and (g); establishment of a framework leading to sustainable patterns of economic development that will secure steadily increasing economic growth while restraining the growth of greenhouse gas emissions; (iii) combined approach including both policies and measures as well as targets and timetables such as 2005 and 2010, taking into account the differences in starting points and approaches, economic structures and resource bases as set out in Article 4(2)(a); (iv) coordinated policies and measures covering CO2 and other greenhouse gases, in particular in those areas where international coordination is called for in view of competitiveness concerns, priority being given to: - measures subject to competitiveness concerns; - measures concerning globall ...

Hon. Paul Martin (Minister of Finance and Minister responsible for the Federal Office of Regional Development-Quebec): Mr. Speaker, regarding not only the cuts but also our plan to streamline government and to really make it much more efficient, in co-operation with the President of the Treasury Board and the Minister responsible for Public Service Renewal, we have outlined in our budget the most substantial government reform process since World War II. Mr. Gaston Leroux (Richmond-Wolfe): Mr. Speaker, does the minister not agree that, by acting without delay on the government cuts recommended by the Auditor General year after year, he w ...[+++]ould show a real political will to end the waste of public funds instead of going after the unemployed, the poor and the aged?