Traduction de «translation of être l'exécutant » (Français → Anglais) :

On 22 December 1975, the Commission concluded with the American company World Translation Center Inc (‘WTC’) an initial contract for the installation and development of machine translation software (English-French) called ‘Systran’ (SYStem TRANslation), created by that company in 1968.

Last September, the UN catalogued the abuses perpetrated by Iran, including torture and cruelty, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment, public executions and executions of juvenile defenders, the use of stoning as a measure of execution, violation of women's rights, violations of the rights of minorities, and restrictions on freedom of assembly and association and freedom of opinion and expression.

For the purposes of delivering best execution where there is more than one competing venue to execute an order for a financial instrument, in order to assess and compare the results for the client that would be achieved by executing the order on each of the execution venues listed in the firm's order execution policy that is capable of executing that order, the firm's own commissions and costs for executing the order on each of the eligible execution venues shall be taken into account in that assessment.

This means that if, all else being equal, venue A offers an instrument for 100 euros and the costs of executing on that venue (e.g. exchange fees, settlement fees, etc.) amount to 5 euros (making the total consideration equal to 105 euros), while another venue B offers the same instrument for 102 euros with costs of execution equal to 2 euros, the investment firm should execute a client order to buy this financial instrument on venue B, since the total consideration of 104 euros delivers a better result for the retail client.

As is the case in the Convention between the Member States of the European Communities on the enforcement of foreign criminal sentences of 13 November 1991, the State of enforcement has two options as to the manner of enforcement: the relevant authorities of the State of enforcement must either proceed to immediate enforcement of the sentence or convert the sentence, through a judicial or administrative procedure, into a decision of that State, thereby substituting for the penalty imposed in the sentencing State a penalty prescribed by the law of the administering State for the same offence (Article 9).

The transfer of enforcement of a sentence needs the agreement of the sentencing State and the administering State and may take place only if it satisfies all the conditions set out in Article 5 of the Convention, namely: (a) the judgment is final and enforceable; (b) the acts or omissions on account of which the sentence has been imposed constitute one of the offences referred to in Article 1(1)(a) according to the law of the administering State or would constitute such an offence if committed in its territory ("dual criminality"); (c) under the laws of the sentencing State or the administering State, the enforcement is not barred by time limitations; (d) ...[+++] final judgment against the sentenced person in respect of the same acts has not been delivered in the administering State; and (e) when a final judgment against the sentenced person in respect of the same acts has been delivered in a third State, the transfer of enforcement would not run counter to the principle of prohibiting double jeopardy.