Traduction de «1996-97 Public Opinion Research Plan » (Anglais → Français) :

To restore access to quality health care for Canadians, the Canadian Medical Association recommends these four points: first, at a minimum, that the federal government restore CHST cash entitlements to the 1996-97 levels, that is, back to the $18.5 billion from the current $12.5 billion; second, beginning April 1, 1998, that the federal government fully index CHST cash payments through the use of a combination of factors that would take into account technology, economic growth, population growth, and demographics such as aging; third, that the federal government establish a national target, either in per capita terms or as a proportion ...[+++] of total health spending, and an implementation plan for health research and development spending, including the full spectrum of basic biomedical to applied health services research, with the objective of improving Canada's position relative to the other G-7 countries, where we now rank a shameful last among the five recent G-7 countries for which recent data is available; and finally, the Canadian Medical Association calls upon the federal government to fulfil its promise to invest $100 million over the coming five years into the tobacco demand reduction strategy, and as well, to increase excise and export taxes to their previous level to decrease tobacco consumption in the most price-sensitive segments of the market: our children, teens, and pre-teens, who are most sensitive to price.

Mr. Neville: If you were to take the Government of Canada's financial statements that are available today and the most recent ones would be for the 1996-97 fiscal year by way of the public accounts last fall, you would notice that one item on the balance sheet, which is by far the largest item on the balance sheet, is " pension plans" the federal government pension plans, all the pension plans together.

54. Notes with concern the relative lack of references to the territorial approach, and in particular to cross-border cooperation, in the Sixth Cohesion Report, despite the fact that it is an essential tool for strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion; points out that the inclusion of all the cross-border and macro-regional aspects would have had an enriching effect, as far as e.g. infrastructure, labour markets and mobility, the environment (including a joint contingency plan), water use and disposal, waste management, health care, research and development, ...[+++] tourism, public services and governance are concerned, as all of these areas include remarkable cross-border elements and potential; is of the opinion that in the programming period 2014-2020, the performance of European border and cross-border regions in coming to terms with the crisis – by growing smarter, more inclusive and more sustainable – will improve considerably;

54. Notes with concern the relative lack of references to the territorial approach, and in particular to cross-border cooperation, in the Sixth Cohesion Report, despite the fact that it is an essential tool for strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion; points out that the inclusion of all the cross-border and macro-regional aspects would have had an enriching effect, as far as e.g. infrastructure, labour markets and mobility, the environment (including a joint contingency plan), water use and disposal, waste management, health care, research and development, ...[+++] tourism, public services and governance are concerned, as all of these areas include remarkable cross-border elements and potential; is of the opinion that in the programming period 2014-2020, the performance of European border and cross-border regions in coming to terms with the crisis – by growing smarter, more inclusive and more sustainable – will improve considerably;