Traduction de «Administrative and judicial machinery » (Anglais → Français) :

first administrative or judicial finding | primary administrative finding | primary administrative or judicial finding

court operations | judicial administration | court procedures | judicial processes

administration by the court | judicial administration | simple bankruptcy

a form of administrative or judicial constraint | administrative or legal measure of constraint

administrator [ judicial administrator ]

Canadian administrative tribunals: towards judicialization or dejudicialization? [ Canadian administrative tribunals ]

misleading the judicial authorities | misleading the authorities responsible for the administration of justice

(3) Subject to section 250, a vessel that is equipped in accordance with the Administration’s requirements for periodically unattended machinery spaces may operate with periodically unattended machinery spaces if the remote control and monitoring systems for those spaces are inspected in accordance with the Administration’s rules and the inspection certificate contains a notation confirming the inspection.

Since a first step has already been taken to distance the political machinery of government from quasi-judicial tribunals, the Bar would like to go one step further and examine such issues as terms of office, how these terms are or are not renewed and the general conditions governing the appointment of members to administrative tribunals and in this instance, to the future Canada Labour Relations Bo ...[+++]ard.

What is their position in terms of the way the judicial or administrative machinery operates?

Question No. 436 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to costs and expenses related to appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada: (a) what accounts for the difference in costs between appointment processes; (b) who and what entities submit costs for reimbursement; (c) are any costs rejected for reimbursement and, if so, (i) on what basis, (ii) who makes the determination, (iii) what criteria are used in making the determination; (d) what reimbursement requests were rejected for the appointment processes of (i) Justice M. Rothstein, (ii) Justice T. Cromwell, (iii) Justice M. Moldaver and Justice A. Karakatsanis, (iv) Justice R. Wager, (v) Justice M. Nadon; (e) in the breakdown of appointment process costs provided in the answer to Q-239, how ...[+++] are the following categories defined (i) Travel and Telecommunications, (ii) Information and Printing Services, (iii) Legal Services, (iv) Translation and Professional Services, (v) Rentals, (vi) Miscellaneous Supplies, (vii) Acquisition of Machinery and Equipment; (f) what types of costs are included under the headings (i) Travel and Telecommunications, (ii) Information and Printing Services, (iii) Legal Services, (iv) Translation and Professional Services, (v) Rentals, (vi) Miscellaneous Supplies, (vii) Acquisition of Machinery and Equipment; (g) who bears the costs incurred in the following categories and, if costs are shared, with which entity or entities are they shared: (i) Travel and Telecommunications, (ii) Information and Printing Services, (iii) Legal Services, (iv) Translation and Professional Services, (v) Rentals, (vi) Miscellaneous Supplies, (vii) Acquisition of Machinery and Equipment; (h) why are there no “Information and Printing” costs associated with Justice Cromwell’s appointment; (i) what was the maximum budget set for the appointment processes reported in the government’s answer to written question Q-239; (j) what accounts for the greater costs of “Translation and Professional Services” for the appointm ...