Translation of "Advisory Committee on Post Adjustment Questions " (English → French) :

Expert Committee on Post Adjustments | ECPA [Abbr.]

Expert Committee on Post Adjustments | ECPA [Abbr.]

Nordic Advisory Committee on Development Aid Questions

Nordic Advisory Committee on Data Processing Questions

In the present case, as the job description contained in the vacancy notice corresponded to administrative and advisory functions, functions which, according to Article 5(2) of the Staff Regulations, are performed by staff in function group AD from grade AD 5 upwards, it was right that the vacancy notice provided that officials applying for the post in question should be in one of the grades AD 5 to AD 14 and that the successful candidate would be appointed in his existing grade.

30. Takes note of the creation of the new Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services on 1 November 2013; recalls that it was created in a budgetary neutral way by redeployments from DGs PRES and IPOL and that the new Directorate-General will not require new human or financial resources in 2015; calls for information on the number of posts in the new Directorate in August/September 2014, including the planned transfer of posts from the two European Advisory ...[+++] class=yellow2> Committees, as compared to the situation in January 2014 and asks for a breakdown of how its external expertise resources are to be used, which should be presented to the Committee on Budgets in due time for the preparation of the Parliament's reading of the budget for 2015;

The Legal Affairs Committee considered the above question at its meeting of 27 November 2012. At this meeting, it accordingly decided, by 16 votes in favour, 0 against and one abstention, to recommend that the appropriate legal basis for the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020) should be Article 175 TFEU.

33. Welcomes the steady but timid progress towards a more balanced gender participation in FP7, since diversity is important for creativity and innovation; points out that female researchers tend to work on smaller, less profiled research projects and tasks and that a highly problematic ‘glass ceiling’ seems to exist for female researchers, leading to a decrease of the share of female researchers with seniority, as also indicated by the low number of female researchers selected for the ERC advanced investigator grant; agrees that measures to boost female participation should be reinforced throughout project lifecycles (with particular attention to flexible working hours, improved child-care facilities, social security provisions and paren ...[+++]tal leave) and that the Commission should reinvigorate its approach to promoting female scientists and should aim to galvanise Member States to address gender gaps; underlines that the 40% target for female participation in the Programme and Advisory Committees should be sensitively implemented; calls on the Commission to establish a cross-cutting committee to monitor and advice on the representation of female researchers and to develop a Gender Action Plan as recommended by the FP6 Ex Post Evaluation; calls on universities and EU Institutions to promote science as an interesting field for both sexes from early stages of education on, by promoting female researchers as role models;