Traduction de «CARDS Committee » (Anglais → Français) :

CARDS Committee (assistance for Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia)

electronic money [ auto-bank card | cash card | charge card | credit card | debit card | defered debit card | delayed debit card | electronic purse | e-money | e-money payment | multiservices card | payment card ]

Nation's Report Card, National Assessment of Educational Progress [ NRC | National Assessment of Educational Progress, The Nation's Report Card | National Assessment of Educational Progress | Committee on Assessing the Progress of Education | Exploratory Committee on Assessing the Progress of Education ]

expansion card [ adapter card | add-on card | communication card | sound card | video card ]

private label card | private label credit card | proprietary card | proprietary credit card | retailed card | store card

edge-punched card [ margin-punched card | verge-punched card | verge-perforated card | border punched card | marginal hole punched card | needle sort card ]

card-programmed computer [ tabulating card computer | card-oriented computer | punched card computer | card program calculator | card-based computer | card computer ]

card | carding machine | carding-machine | cards | carding engine | carding-engines | card engine

parliamentary committee [ parliamentary sub-committee ]

Consultations on the strategy paper had been held during spring 2001 with EU Member States (CARDS Committee), international financial institutions, the targeted countries - the countries which are part of the Stabilisation and Association Process (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Republic of Macedonia, F.R. Yugoslavia) - and the Stability Pact Working Table II (May 2001).

The following spoke: Nils Torvalds (rapporteur for the opinion of the BUDG Committee), Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto (rapporteur for the opinion of the EMPL Committee), Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz (rapporteur for the opinion of the IMCO Committee), Ernest Urtasun (rapporteur for the opinion of the FEMM Committee), who also replied to a blue-card question by Tim Aker, Burkhard Balz, on behalf of the PPE Group, Elisa Ferreira, on behalf of the SD Group, who also replied to a blue-card question by István Ujhelyi, and Stanisław Ożóg, on behalf of the ECR Group.

The following spoke: Nils Torvalds (rapporteur for the opinion of the BUDG Committee), Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto (rapporteur for the opinion of the EMPL Committee), Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz (rapporteur for the opinion of the IMCO Committee), Ernest Urtasun (rapporteur for the opinion of the FEMM Committee) , who also replied to a blue-card question by Tim Aker , Burkhard Balz , on behalf of the PPE Group, Elisa Ferreira , on behalf of the SD Group , who also replied to a blue-card question by István Ujhelyi , and Stanisław Ożóg , on behalf of the ECR Group .

28. Calls on the Commission to propose a better SEPA governance, covering the organisational setup related to the development of the main features of payment services and of the implementation of the requirements which need to be met, and allowing the development of technical and security standards to be organised separately in support of the implementation of the related legislation; calls for a more balanced representation of all stakeholders in the further development of common technical and security standards for payment schemes; urges the Commission to answer its previous calls for reform of SEPA governance so as to ensure better representation of payment services users in the decision-making and standard-setting process; notes that ...[+++] these stakeholders ay include – but are not necessarily restricted to – the EPC, consumer organisations, merchant organisations and large retail chains, the European Banking Authority (EBA), the Commission, experts in various fields, non-banking payment service providers, and mobile, internet and card commerce and mobile network operators; calls on these stakeholders to arrange their work under a new governance structure where the SEPA Council has a role; considers that the SEPA Council should be assisted by various technical committees, or ‘task forces’ for e-payment, m-payment, cards, cash and other standardisation issues, and by ad hoc working groups; recalls the Commission's commitment, in the declaration on SEPA governance on the adoption of Regulation (EU) No 260/2012, to come up with proposal before the end of 2012; calls on European standardisation bodies such as the European Committee for Standardisation (Comité Européen de Normalisation, CEN) and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), in cooperation with the Commission, to play a more active role in standardising card payments;