Traduction de «Control period close » (Anglais → Français) :

Even with a less ambitious approach, the EDPS recommends, at a minimum, that the Regulation contains the following requirements: (i) the creation of an internal security policy following a comprehensive risk assessment and taking into account international standards and best practices in Member States, (ii) the appointment of a security officer in charge of implementing the policy with the adequate resources and authority, (iii) the approval of this policy after a close examination of the residual risk and the controls proposed by the Man ...[+++]agement Board, and (iv) a periodic review of the policy with a clear statement of the periodicity timeframe chosen and the objectives of the review.

Recognises attempts by the Council and the Commission to organise a second round of the European Union-Uzbekistan dialogue on human rights in May 2008 and commends the Commission on its efforts to organise a civil society seminar on media expression in the margins of the dialogue, possibly in Tashkent; points out once again that the holding of a dialogue on human rights and experts' meetings on the 2005 Andijan massacre do not in themselves constitute progress and cannot be used as a reason for the lifting of sanctions; notes that the absence of an independent international inquiry into the Andijan massacre and the lack of any improvement in the human rights situation in Uzbekistan — these being the conditions laid down by the European Un ...[+++]ion for the lifting of sanctions — have logically led to the sanctions against Uzbekistan being extended; welcomes the fact that the conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council of 15-16 October 2007 have introduced specific conditions which have to be met within a period of six months in order for the visa restriction suspension to be maintained; invites the Council and the Commission to carry out a serious assessment of the impact of the decision to suspend for six months some of the visa restrictions that form part of the European Union sanctions against Uzbekistan, and to review the overall human rights situation in the country; deplores the fact that Uzbekistan has so far failed to deliver any progress in any of these respects; pays tribute to the work done by its Subcommittee on Human Rights in closely monitoring the human rights situation every six months so as to provide the Council with regular parliamentary assessments and recommendations as regards the EU policy to be adopted in this matter; is appalled by the presidential election held on 23 December 2007 in Uzbekistan, which according to the ODIHR was ‘held in a strictly controlled political environment, leaving no room for real opposition, a ...

Applying an economic approach to State aid for innovation based on ex ante rules may be considered appropriate if transparent, non-discriminating and providing for legal certainty. The Commission, in close cooperation with the European Parliament, should carry a periodical review, control and evaluation of the effectiveness of these rules.

Information shall be provided on the execution of the programme of scrutinies for the period ending on 30 June preceding the closing date for submission of the report, as referred to in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 4045/89, including the following points, both in total and broken down by control body (where more than one carries out controls under that Regulation):

Commissioner, you globalised fishing in the south of Europe, and ensured that the place occupied by a small-scale fleet, under an agreement between Morocco and the European Union, which respected biological rest periods and maintained very close control of nets and meshes, should now be taken in these fishing grounds by a fleet which does not respect rest periods, and whose nets are not controlled at all.

Even with a less ambitious approach, the EDPS recommends, at a minimum, that the Regulation contains the following requirements: (i) the creation of an internal security policy following a comprehensive risk assessment and taking into account international standards and best practices in Member States, (ii) the appointment of a security officer in charge of implementing the policy with the adequate resources and authority, (iii) the approval of this policy after a close examination of the residual risk and the controls proposed by the Man ...[+++]agement Board, and (iv) a periodic review of the policy with a clear statement of the periodicity timeframe chosen and the objectives of the review.