Traduction de «Declaration that the policy is void » (Anglais → Français) :

declaration that the policy is void [ declaration that the policy is forfeited ]

it cannot be accepted that the court,by implication declared a measure to be void and then ordered the Commission to adopt another one having the same effect

take the necessary steps to comply with the judgment declaring a decision to be void

Declaration Concerning the Policy of Apartheid in South Africa [ Declaration Concerning the Policy of Apartheid of the Republic of South Africa ]

declare the agreement to be void

Smallpox[Footnote: In 1980 the 33rd World Health Assembly declared that smallpox had been eradicated. The classification is maintained for surveillance purposes.]

suspension of the effects of the decision which has been declared void

In order to avoid creating a fresh unfairness, Bill C-32 also specifies that if prior to the coming into force of this act the couple obtained a court order in Canada or in another country that either declared their marriage null and void or provided them with a divorce, which has happened in a few instances in the United States, then the marriage is dissolved as of the time of that initial order, and the couple will not have to seek a new order.

In the Test Achats case, the Court of Justice made crystal clear that not only do we have a legally binding Charter of Fundamental Rights for the EU but that we also have a constitutional court at EU level that stands ready to apply and enforce the Charter very effectively if need be – a court that will not shy away from declaring EU legislation null and void should it violate the Charter.

(Return tabled) Question No. 331 Hon. Carolyn Bennett: With regard to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, endorsed by the government in November 2010: (a) what concrete actions has the government taken to implement the Declaration; (b) what steps has the government taken to consult with First Nations on the implementation of the Declaration; (c) what steps has the government taken to consult with the provincial and territorial governments on the implementation of the Declaration; (d) how does the government define the term “aspirational” which it has used to characterize its approach to implementing the ...[+++] Declaration; (e) are there any other international agreements that the government considers not legally binding or “aspirational”; (f) what criteria does the government use to determine whether a policy is “aspirational”; (g) what is the government’s position concerning whether or not the Declaration will be binding in the future; (h) did the government communicate its position that the Declaration is “aspirational” and non-binding to First Nations and the other levels of government in advance of endorsing the Declaration; (i) what directives have been provided to Ministers, political exempt staff and public servants concerning the use of the Declaration in developing policy and programs; (j) does a process exist to ensure that all legislation, regulations and policy concerning indigenous peoples are compliant with the Declaration; and (k) has training on the Declaration been provided to employees of the Treasury Board and Privy Council Office?

Lastly, the General Court recalls that, by way of derogation from Article 280 TFEU, its decisions declaring a regulation to be void take effect only after the expiry of the time-limit for bringing an appeal before the Court of Justice, that is to say, two months and ten days from notification of the judgment or, if an appeal has been brought, after it is dismissed.