Traduction de «Derivative evidence » (Anglais → Français) :

derivative evidence | reported evidence | second-hand evidence | substitutionary evidence | unoriginal evidence

derivative evidence | substitutionary evidence | transmitted evidence | unoriginal evidence

derivative evidence [ second-hand evidence | transmitted evidence | unoriginal evidence ]

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

autoptic evidence | demonstrative evidence | mathematical evidence | objective evidence | objective fact evidence | real evidence | tangible evidence | tangible exhibit

evidence in contradiction [ rebuttal evidence | evidence in rebuttal | proof of a rebutting case | rebutting evidence | evidence in reply | reply evidence ]

autoptic evidence [ real evidence | demonstrative evidence | tangible evidence | objective evidence ]

derivative | derivative instrument | derivative product | financial derivative | financial derivative product | financial derivative instrument

burden of adducing evidence | burden of evidence | burden of going forward | burden of going forward with the evidence | burden of producing evidence

(48) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation as regards exports, implementing powers should also be conferred on the Commission in respect of measures defining the procedures for declaring and the evidence needed to prove the composition of the exported non-Annex I goods necessary for the implementation of the export refund system, the simplified evidence needed to prove arrival at destination in the case of differentiated refunds, measures on the application of horizontal provisions on export r ...[+++]efunds for non-Annex I goods, measures on the implementation of the export refund certificate system as regards the submission, the format and the content of the application for the refund certificate, the format, the content and the period of validity of the refund certificate, the procedure for lodging applications and issuing refund certificates and for their use, the procedure for lodging a security and its amount, the level of tolerance for the amounts of export refund which were not applied for and the means of proving that the obligations derived from the refund certificate have been fulfilled.

In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation as regards exports, implementing powers should also be conferred on the Commission in respect of measures defining the procedures for declaring and the evidence needed to prove the composition of the exported non-Annex I goods necessary for the implementation of the export refund system, the simplified evidence needed to prove arrival at destination in the case of differentiated refunds, measures on the application of horizontal provisions on export refund ...[+++]s for non-Annex I goods, measures on the implementation of the export refund certificate system as regards the submission, the format and the content of the application for the refund certificate, the format, the content and the period of validity of the refund certificate, the procedure for lodging applications and issuing refund certificates and for their use, the procedure for lodging a security and its amount, the level of tolerance for the amounts of export refund which were not applied for and the means of proving that the obligations derived from the refund certificate have been fulfilled.

Even though the matter of the ‘driver’ remains controversial in the academic and institutional literature, there is a growing body of evidence corroborated by several of the most recent empirical studies which highlight the major potential distortive and disruptive role played by the financialization of commodity trading irrespective of whether commodity based derivative contracts are assumed to drive ‘spot prices’ or to be driven by them.

evidence of conformity to other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates)