Traduction de «Negative selection » (Anglais → Français) :

Banks and venture capitalists are very selective when offering risk capital, in particular, for areas that are perceived by them to have a high technical risk, uncertain time-to-market, or could have negative ethical, health or environmental consequences.

(2) In determining the net tax for a reporting period of a manager (in this subsection referred to as the “manager’s reporting period”) that has made joint elections with one or more investment plans (each of which is referred to in this subsection as a “qualifying investment plan”) under subsection 55(1) of the Selected Listed Financial Institutions Attribution Method (GST/HST) Regulations that are in effect at any time in the manager’s reporting period, the manager shall add all positive amounts, and may, if the manager has paid or credited the negative amount to ...[+++] the qualifying investment plan, deduct any such negative amounts, each of which is the positive amount that a qualifying investment plan would be required to add, or the negative amount that the qualifying investment plan would be able to deduct, in determining its net tax under this subsection, having regard to any applicable adaptations to this subsection made under those Regulations, for a particular reporting period of the qualifying investment plan if

(2) In determining the net tax for a reporting period of a manager (in this subsection referred to as the “manager’s reporting period”) that has made joint elections with one or more investment plans (each of which is referred to in this subsection as a “qualifying investment plan”) under subsection 55(1) of the Selected Listed Financial Institutions Attribution Method (GST/HST) Regulations that are in effect at any time in the manager’s reporting period, the manager shall add all positive amounts, and may, if the manager has paid or credited the negative amount to ...[+++] the qualifying investment plan, deduct any such negative amounts, each of which is the positive amount that a qualifying investment plan would be required to add, or the negative amount that the qualifying investment plan would be able to deduct, in determining its net tax under this subsection, having regard to any applicable adaptations to this subsection made under those Regulations, for a particular reporting period of the qualifying investment plan if

(c) if the manager is a selected listed financial institution throughout the manager’s reporting period, the total of all particular amounts is a prescribed amount for the manager’s reporting period for the purpose of the description of G in subsection 225.2(2) of the Act, each of those particular amounts being the positive amount that a qualifying investment plan would be required to add, or the negative amount (in subsection (3) referred to as the “negative adjustment amount”) that the qualifying investment plan would be able to ded ...[+++]uct, in determining its net tax under subsection 225.2(2) of the Act, having regard to any applicable adaptations made to that subsection under these Regulations, for a particular reporting period of the qualifying investment plan if

(c) if the manager is a selected listed financial institution throughout the manager’s reporting period, the total of all particular amounts is a prescribed amount for the manager’s reporting period for the purpose of the description of G in subsection 225.2(2) of the Act, each of those particular amounts being the positive amount that a qualifying investment plan would be required to add, or the negative amount (in subsection (3) referred to as the “negative adjustment amount”) that the qualifying investment plan would be able to ded ...[+++]uct, in determining its net tax under subsection 225.2(2) of the Act, having regard to any applicable adaptations made to that subsection under these Regulations, for a particular reporting period of the qualifying investment plan if

(Return tabled) Question No. 611 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to the government’s plans for resource development, as described in the section entitled “Responsible Resource Development” in Chapter 3.2 of Budget 2012: (a) what are all examples of federal environmental laws that are stronger than provincial laws and how will the proposed legislative changes to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) affect the assessment of environmental impacts of industrial projects that cross provincial borders; (b) what research, action, or investment has the government undertaken to study impacts of the proposed legislative changes to the ...[+++] CEAA on (i) regulatory decision-making, (ii) risk of project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts, (iii) risk mitigation by developers, (iv) Canada’s reputation; (c) what briefing notes, memos, or any other documentation, including, for each, the details of its findings and recommendations, have been provided to the Prime Minister, Minister of Natural Resources, Minister of the Environment, their respective Parliamentary Secretaries, their respective Deputy Ministers, and their respective staff members, regarding impacts of the proposed legislative changes to the CEAA on (i) regulatory decision-making, (ii) risk of project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts, (iii) mitigation by developers, (iv) Canada’s reputation; (d) will the proposed legislative changes to the CEAA give any consideration to (i) measuring negative impacts of development, (ii) managing negative impacts of development; (e) by what date will the government bring forth new “legislation to streamline the review process for major economic projects” (Budget 2012, p. 89); (f) what are the projected costs of changes to the CEAA for each province and territory; (g) what assessments of the adequacy of the environmental assessment process in each province and territory have been conducted, (i) what were the dates of any such assessments, (ii) what wer ...