Traduction de «Neither-NOR operation » (Anglais → Français) :

neither-NOR operation | non-disjunction | NOR operation | NOT-OR operation

NEITHER-NOR operation | non-disjunction | NOR operation

NEITHER-NOR operation | non-disjunction | NOR operation

nondisjunction [ non-disjunction | NOR operation | NEITHER-NOR operation | neither-NOR operation | nondisjunction operation | NOT-OR operation ]

non-disjunction operation | NOR operation | NEITHER-NOR operation

neither-nor principle [ neither-nor rule | neither-nor law ]

DCIS nuclear pleomorphism, grade 2: neither nuclear grade 1 nor nuclear grade 3

Definition: This category differs from others in that it includes disorders identifiable on the basis of not only symptoms and course but also the existence of one or other of two causative influences: an exceptionally stressful life event producing an acute stress reaction, or a significant life change leading to continued unpleasant circumstances that result in an adjustment disorder. Although less severe psychosocial stress ( life events ) may precipitate the onset or contribute to the presentation of a very wide range of disorders classified elsewhere in this chapter, its etiological importance is not always clear and in each case wi ...[+++]ll be found to depend on individual, often idiosyncratic, vulnerability, i.e. the life events are neither necessary nor sufficient to explain the occurrence and form of the disorder. In contrast, the disorders brought together here are thought to arise always as a direct consequence of acute severe stress or continued trauma. The stressful events or the continuing unpleasant circumstances are the primary and overriding causal factor and the disorder would not have occurred without their impact. The disorders in this section can thus be regarded as maladaptive responses to severe or continued stress, in that they interfere with successful coping mechanisms and therefore lead to problems of social functioning.

Definition: Arises as a delayed or protracted response to a stressful event or situation (of either brief or long duration) of an exceptionally threatening or catastrophic nature, which is likely to cause pervasive distress in almost anyone. Predisposing factors, such as personality traits (e.g. compulsive, asthenic) or previous history of neurotic illness, may lower the threshold for the development of the syndrome or aggravate its course, but they are neither necessary nor sufficient to explain its occurrence. Typical features include episodes of repeated reliving of the trauma in intrusive memories ( flashbacks ), dreams or nightmares ...[+++], occurring against the persisting background of a sense of numbness and emotional blunting, detachment from other people, unresponsiveness to surroundings, anhedonia, and avoidance of activities and situations reminiscent of the trauma. There is usually a state of autonomic hyperarousal with hypervigilance, an enhanced startle reaction, and insomnia. Anxiety and depression are commonly associated with the above symptoms and signs, and suicidal ideation is not infrequent. The onset follows the trauma with a latency period that may range from a few weeks to months. The course is fluctuating but recovery can be expected in the majority of cases. In a small proportion of cases the condition may follow a chronic course over many years, with eventual transition to an enduring personality change (F62.0). | Traumatic neurosis

The marine environment is also lagging far behind in terms of protection, as the Natura 2000 marine environment network, which was scheduled for completion in 2012, is still neither ecologically coherent nor operational.

The Commission recognises that as a result of the size and complexity of the data needed to be collected and processed for MiFID II to become operational, in particular for transaction reporting, transparency calculations and reporting of positions in commodity derivatives, neither stakeholders, such as trading platforms, nor NCAs nor ESMA are in a position to ensure that the necessary data collection infrastructures would be in place and become operational by 3 January 2017.

Therefore, the investment firm or market operator operating the OTF should be subject to requirements in relation to non-discriminatory execution and neither the investment firm or market operator operating the OTF nor any entity that is part of the same group or legal person as the investment firm or market operator should be allowed to execute client orders in an OTF against its proprietary capital.

While the contribution of EU legislation to the global development of legal regulation of e-commerce is to be valued, it must at the same time be acknowledged that current European legislation does not take sufficient account of the newest trends in the digital environment, and in certain areas it is even more of a hindrance; e.g. one single electronic transaction is usually subject to several legal provisions setting divergent requirements, meaning that neither business operators nor consumers have clear and easily enforceable rules.