Translation of "New Oil Reference Price Supplement " (English → French) :

6. Subject to sections 11 to 14, the fee for the examination of a new drug submission, a supplement to a new drug submission, an abbreviated new drug submission or a supplement to an abbreviated new drug submission referred to in section C.08.002, C.08.002.1 or C.08.003 of the Food and Drug Regulations or an application for a drug identification number under section C.01.014.1 of those Regulations is, in respect of the submission class set out in column 1 of Schedule 1 and described in column 2, the fee set out in column 3. The fee is ...[+++] payable by the person who files the submission or supplement or makes the application.

(a) the examination of a new drug submission, a supplement to a new drug submission, an abbreviated new drug submission or a supplement to an abbreviated new drug submission referred to in section C.08.002, C.08.002.1 or C.08.003 of the Food and Drug Regulations, an application in respect of an establishment licence under those Regulations or an application for a drug identification number under section C.01.014.1 of those Regulations;

(m) in the case of conventional new oil revenues referred to in paragraph (m) of that definition, revenues derived by a province – other than those described in paragraphs (o) and (p) – that are attributable to new oil that is from hydrocarbon deposits in the province, including revenues derived from

The Commission considers that, given that this new standard provides a specific analytical method to analyse the relevant PAHs in extender oils and overcomes the shortcomings of the previous method, it is appropriate to replace the citation of method IP 346:1998 by the new standard EN 16143:2013 as the reference method to determine compliance of extender oils with the restriction in paragraph 1 of column 2 of entry 50 of Annex XVII ...[+++] to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

Question No. 140 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to development of the oil sands, its impacts on the environment and surrounding communities, and the economic effects of these impacts: (a) what, if any, steps has the government taken to establish air emission limits or air quality standards to achieve the World Health Organization’s Air Quality Guidelines to protect air quality and human health; (b) what, if any, steps has the government’s sector-by-sector approach taken to regulate carbon emissions in the oil sands to ensure the oil sands industry makes appropriate reductions in its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to contribute to Canada’s GHG emission reduction goal of 17% be ...[+++]low the 2005 level; (c) what, if any, studies has the government undertaken to examine the effect of the oil sands expansion on (i) GHG emissions, (ii) Canada’s ability to meet its GHG emission reduction goals, (iii) Canada’s contribution to the goal of staying below a 2°C increase in global average surface temperature, relative to the pre-industrial level, as articulated at the G8 meeting in L’Aquila, Italy and at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change negotiations through the Copenhagen Accord in December 2009 and the Cancun Agreements in December 2010, (iv) the full suite of sustainability criteria, including environmental, economic and social sustainability, and (v) what were the results of any studies identified in (c)(i), (c)(ii), (c)(iii), and (c)(iv); (d) what, if any, studies has the government undertaken to examine (i) the scope of oil sands expansion if the oil sands sector is not required to deliver its proportional share of GHG reductions, (ii) the impacts such a decision would have on other sectors’ allowable GHG emissions, (iii) whether other sectors of the Canadian economy would have to do more than their proportional share to reduce emissions, (iv) what were the results of any studies identified in (d)(i), (d)(ii), and (d)(iii); (e) what, if any, studies ...

This amount is mainly attributable to $5.5 billion in the forecast for the consolidated specified purpose accounts; $192 million more for Old Age Security benefits; and $228 million less for Guaranteed Income Supplements, both based on updated population and average monthly rate forecasts; $125 million for the AgriInsurance program based on higher crop values and an increase in the number of acres covered; $78 million for the AgriStability program driven primarily by declining grain and oil seed prices in 2009, which affected the ...[+++]value of inventories; $465.3 million for Newfoundland and Labrador in the form of fiscal equalization offset payments; a decrease of $640.8 million in payments to the Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Resource Revenue Fund due to a decline in crude oil prices, increased costs and a temporary reduction in production levels associated with the expansion of the White Rose project; and a total decrease of $1.4 billion to projected infrastructure payments under various initiatives, including the communities component of the Building Canada Fund, the establishment of the Green Infrastructure Fund, provincial-territorial infrastructure-based funding, and funding to support the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund.