Translation of "Now experience " (English → French) :

Newcomer Opportunities For Work experience [ Now experience ]

Community initiative to promote equal opportunities for women in the field of employment and vocational training | Employment-NOW | Employment-NOW (New Opportunities for Women) | Employment-NOW Initiative

Definition: Dream experiences loaded with anxiety or fear. There is very detailed recall of the dream content. The dream experience is very vivid and usually includes themes involving threats to survival, security, or self-esteem. Quite often there is a recurrence of the same or similar frightening nightmare themes. During a typical episode there is a degree of autonomic discharge but no appreciable vocalization or body motility. Upon awakening the individual rapidly becomes alert and oriented. | Dream anxiety disorder

carry out experiments on animals | perform experiments on animals | conduct experiments on animals | run experiments on animals

Planning Now for an Information Society: Tomorrow is too Late [ Planning Now for an Information Society ]

Longterm Inmates Now in the Community [ LINC | Long Term Inmates Now in the Community ]

Out-of-Body Experience | out-of-the-body experience | OBE [Abbr.] | OOBE [Abbr.] | OTBE [Abbr.]

job experience | occupational achievements | professional experience

Definition: A fairly well-defined cluster of phobias embracing fears of leaving home, entering shops, crowds and public places, or travelling alone in trains, buses or planes. Panic disorder is a frequent feature of both present and past episodes. Depressive and obsessional symptoms and social phobias are also commonly present as subsidiary features. Avoidance of the phobic situation is often prominent, and some agoraphobics experience little anxiety because they are able to avoid their phobic situations. | Agoraphobia without history of panic disorder Panic disorder with agoraphobia

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

When it comes to public procurement a recent Commission survey suggests that SMEs now experience fewer administrative burdens when accessing public procurement and have better opportunities for joint bidding.

After a period of investigations and experiments worth around EUR 50 million of mainly public (but also some private) investment, GMES has now reached the stage where key decisions and actions need to be taken for its actual deployment and the practical implementation of operational services between now and 2008.

The Committee believes that the establishment of these mechanisms is a good example of EU values being put into practice, although the time is now ripe for an overall review based on experience so far.

Drawing on the North American experience where the high volume hydraulic fracturing has been broadly used, operators are now testing further this practice in the EU.