Traduction de «Precedent-setting program » (Anglais → Français) :

2. Annual programmes for the outermost regions and associated funding shall be approved by 30 November or, in case the EU- budget is not approved, at the latest by the 31 December of the year preceding the commencement of the program and subsequently by means of a grant decision in relation to the measures implemented and the costs incurred from 1 January to 31 December of the programming year.

(Return tabled) Question No. 206 Mr. Alex Atamanenko: With respect to Canadian Agricultural Income Stabilization (CAIS) program entitlement, the appeals process and exclusion from entitlement to other federal agricultural programs: (a) are appellants entitled to know what recommendations are made by the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee and, if so, how is a copy of the recommendations obtained by the appellant; (b) are appellants entitled to know on what grounds the Intermediate Appeals Sub-Committee rejects recommendations of the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee and, if so, how is a copy of the recommendations obtained ...[+++] by the appellant; (c) has the CAIS administration ever issued rejection letters to an appellant before or after soliciting the involvement of an appeals committee and, if so, how is a copy of the motion or other directive permitting this obtained by the appellant; (d) who is responsible for forwarding recommendations made by the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee to the next level of appeal; (e) are there any legitimate grounds upon which the National CAIS Committee (NCC) administration is allowed to refuse an appellant the full extent of an appeal by neglecting to forward the recommendations of the Western Amalgamated Appeals Sub-Committee to the next level of appeal; (f) does the appeal process deal with appeals on a case by case basis or can the NCC administration short-circuit the appeals process based on a judgment that an appellant's complaint is just like the one that may have preceded it; (g) are there guidelines established that would give an appellant a reasonable expectation of the time it should take to address an appeal at all the various levels and, if so, what are the guidelines that govern a reasonable expectation; (h) is the appellant justified in expecting that the decisions made by appeals committees will be communicated to the appellant; (i) what are the circumstances under which it would be accepta ...

This program was very important to the Fédération des femmes du Québec because it was crucial to financing precedent-setting legal action brought by groups and individuals to dispute federal policies and legislation that violated their constitutional right to equality.

D. whereas, despite a relative improvement in the programming for the period 2000-2006 in comparison to the preceding programming period (1994-1999), the implementation of equal opportunities in operations co-financed by the Structural Funds is far from satisfactory, and whereas most programming documents concerning the European Social Fund (ESF) provide for a dual approach in which the horizontal mainstreaming of equal opportunities can be combined with specific measures in favour of women,

D. whereas, despite a relative improvement in the programming for the period 2000-2006 in comparison to the preceding programming period (1994-1999) the implementation of equal opportunities in operations cofinanced by the Structural Funds is far from satisfactory, and whereas most programming documents concerning the ESF provide for a dual approach in which the horizontal mainstreaming of equal opportunities can be combined with specific measures in favour of women,

Since the precedents of HIV sit in front of Canadians and since the precedents of compensation for thalidomide sit in front of Canadians, does the member see any evidence of an outpouring of frivolous medical malpractice claims because of those compensation programs or can he find any evidence in international experience of such a precedent setting case showing an outpouring of frivolity when it comes to medical malpractice?