Traduction de «Production-possibility schedule » (Anglais → Français) :

(Return tabled) Question No. 177 Mr. Peter Julian: With regard to nanotechnology: (a) what are the total federal funds spent and committed for expenditure, for each of the fiscal years from 2005-2006 through 2008-2009 inclusive, broken down by department and criterion; (b) who are the recipients of these funds; (c) to what purpose was funding for nanotechnology used by institutions and departments, including the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, Natural Resources Canada, Industry Canada, and the National Research Council of Canada; (d) what were the amounts allocated to test health, safety, and environmental impacts of nanoproducts ...[+++]and nanomaterials; (e) what is the list of nanomaterials currently in the market; (f) which of these have been extensively tested to determine possible effects on human and environmental health and safety and, of those tested, which, if any, raised concern or required mitigation or prevention; (g) how many assessments on nanomaterial notification packages have been submitted to the New Substances Notification Program to date and (i) of these notification packages, have there been any nanomaterials rejected for entry into Canada, (ii) have there been any conditions of use placed based on assessment results and, if so, how many; (h) did the government ever request notifiers (companies or individuals) providing nanomaterial notification packages to submit additional toxicity data above and beyond what is requested in the schedules of the New Substances Notification Regulations and, if so, did this result in refusal of entry into the Canadian market or justify use of material with conditions; and (i) what information, notifications or advisories have been issued to ensure the safe discovery, production, manufacturing, use and disposal of nanomaterials and nano-enabled products, (i) when, (ii) by which departments?

For long-term holiday product contracts, the price to be paid in the context of a staggered payment schedule could take into consideration the possibility that subsequent amounts could be adjusted after the first year in order to ensure that the real value of those instalments is maintained, for instance to take account of inflation.

39. Considers that the report to the European Parliament and the Council scheduled for 2008 concerning the possibility of a compulsory labelling system for poultry meat and poultry meat products based on compliance with animal welfare standards should particularly concentrate on compliance with animal welfare standards which go beyond the minimum requirements; takes the view that a labelling programme based on standards higher than the legal minimum would solve the recognised problem faced by consumers who would like to buy a product which has been produced with particular c ...[+++]oncern for animal welfare but are unable to identify such products in the shops;

Whereas consumers looking for different products should be given the possibility to request displays for only scheduled or non-scheduled flights;

Programme production Rapid build-up of an increasing volume of wide-screen programmes in broadcasters' schedules will be critically important for speedy consumer take-up of advanced television products and services. Some programmes exploitable in wide-screen already exist, but there is a need for new programmes which combine the creative potential of wide-screen with the enhanced picture quality advanced television systems make possible in order to maximise the attractiveness of the new services to the viewing public.

In order to avoid any possible confusion, the industry recommends the adoption of a uniform approach across all products listed in the schedule to the greatest extent possible.