Traduction de «Retirement group insurance » (Anglais → Français) :

post-retirement group insurance [ retirement group insurance ]

life, health, annuity/retirement group insurances

retirement pension insurance [ retirement income policy ]

tax-qualified insurance | retirement savings insurance

group insurance plan | group insurance program | group insurance scheme

invalidity and old-age pension insurance | retirement and old age pension insurance

group registered retirement savings plan | group RRSP

Commission Expert Group on Banking, Payments and Insurance | Expert Group on Banking, Payments and Insurance | EGBIP [Abbr.] | EGBPI [Abbr.]

group insurance policy | group insurance

insured persons group | insured persons collective

(2) In this section, “institutional trust” means a trust that is established by a corporation, partnership or other entity for a particular business purpose and includes pension plan trusts, pension master trusts, supplemental pension plan trusts, mutual fund trusts, pooled fund trusts, registered retirement savings plan trusts, registered retirement income fund trusts, registered education savings plan trusts, group registered retirement savings plan trusts, deferred profit sharing plan trusts, employee profit sharing plan trusts, re ...[+++]tirement compensation arrangement trusts, employee savings plan trusts, health and welfare trusts, unemployment benefit plan trusts, foreign insurance company trusts, foreign reinsurance trusts, reinsurance trusts, real estate investment trusts, environmental trusts and trusts established in respect of endowments, foundations and registered charities.

Question No. 413 Mr. Hoang Mai: With regard to the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) response to the provisions of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA): (a) according to the government’s analysis, do the FATCA provisions comply with the provisions of the Convention Between Canada and the United States of America With Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital and its amending Protocol (2007); (b) how many citizens from the United States of America will be affected by FATCA, (ii) are there specific Canadian exemptions to FATCA; (c) has Canada negotiated with United States Treasury officials or the IRS following the announcement of FATCA provisions, (i) at what time was the government made a ...[+++]ware of these provisions, (ii) how long did it take Canada to respond to the initial creation of FATCA and its implementation, (iii) are there ongoing negotiations in this regard; (d) will Canada inform dual citizens about FATCA and, if so, (i) how, (ii) at what time, (iii) what department or agencies will be responsible; (e) has the government conducted any studies or mandated a task force to look into how much FATCA will cost Canadians and, if so, what are the cost implications resulting from the additional regulations and demands, (i) for the government, (ii) for the CRA, (iii) for Canadian banks, (iv) who will absorb these costs, (v) are there other types of non-financial costs such as efficiency or fairness reductions; (f) which Canadian civil liberties associations or other types of association has the government met with to discuss the privacy implications of FATCA and what actions will the government undertake to protect the fundamental civil liberties of all Canadians in this regard; (g) according to the government’s analysis, do the FATCA provisions comply with the provisions of the Privacy Act or the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, and if so, which department undertook this assesment; ...

A diverse and broad group of public interest groups ranging through the National Association of Federal Retirees; the Association of Canadian Pension Management; the Canadian Institute of Actuaries; CARP, Canada's association for the 50-plus; the Common Front for Retirement Security; the Bell Pensioners Group; the Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association; and even the Canadian Labour Congress welcomed and expressed the ...[+++]ir pleasure with it.

This Directive should not apply to managers of non-pooled investments such as endowments, sovereign wealth funds, central banks or credit institutions, institutions for occupational retirement provision or those institutions exclusively managing funds for occupational retirement provisions, or insurance or reinsurance undertakings for assets held on own account, or an undertaking which principally acts as an holding entity for a group of subsidiary under ...[+++]takings and which owns strategic stakes in undertakings with a view to long-term holding rather than for the purpose of generating returns through divestment within a defined time-frame, to be regarded as a collective undertaking.