295. Every one who, being lawfully authorized to solemnize marriage, knowingly and wilfully solemnizes a marriage in contravention of the laws of the province in which the marriage is solemnized is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-09-25]

295. Est coupable d’un acte criminel et passible d’un emprisonnement maximal de deux ans quiconque, étant légalement autorisé à célébrer le mariage, célèbre sciemment et volontairement un mariage en violation des lois de la province où il est célébré.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-09-25]

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca (...) [HTML] [2014-09-25]

These marriages were performed by clergypersons and by secular marriage commissioners, all of whom were licensed to solemnize marriages by their provincial governments and given the civil authority to legally marry couples as defined now by the federal Civil Marriage Act.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePub (...) (...) [HTML] [2006-12-05]

Ces mariages ont été célébrés par des membres du clergé et par des commissaires de mariage laïcs qui avaient tous obtenu de leur gouvernement provincial l'autorisation de célébrer des mariages et le pouvoir civil de célébrer légalement le mariage de deux personnes, comme le prévoit actuellement la Loi fédérale sur le mariage civil.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePub (...) (...) [HTML] [2006-12-05]

http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePub (...) [HTML] [2006-12-05]

On March 5, the Ontario legislature adopted Bill 171 to protect the commissioner appointed to celebrate or solemnize marriage to refuse to solemnize marriage if that hurts their own personal faith.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2005-07-03]

Le 5 mars, l'Assemblée législative de l'Ontario a adopté le projet de loi 171, mesure visant à protéger les commissaires aux mariages qui refuseraient de célébrer des mariages non conformes à leurs croyances religieuses.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2005-07-03]

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) [HTML] [2005-07-03]

I want to come back to an issue that some of my colleagues on the other side of the table raised, which is the argument that there is a danger in opening up civil marriage to same-sex couples because it may affect the status of religious institutions that do now and would continue to refuse to solemnize marriage between same-sex couples. It's my understanding that religious institutions already refuse to solemnize marriage for certain conditions that are permitted under civil law.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePub (...) (...) [HTML] [2003-02-24]

Je veux revenir à une question que certains de mes collègues de l'autre côté de la table ont soulevée, à savoir le danger que pose le fait de permettre le mariage civil pour les couples de même sexe, car cette autorisation pourrait avoir une incidence sur le statut des institutions religieuses, qui refusent à l'heure actuelle, et continueront de refuser, de célébrer des mariages entre conjoints de même sexe.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePub (...) (...) [HTML] [2003-02-24]

http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePub (...) [HTML] [2003-02-24]

For more results, go to https://pro.wordscope.com to translate your documents with Wordscope Pro!

I do not think that a person who refused to solemnize a marriage because of strongly held religious beliefs would be deprived of his or her right to refuse to solemnize marriage.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML]

Je ne pense pas qu'une personne qui a refusé de célébrer un mariage en raison de convictions religieuses profondes soit privée de son droit de refuser de le faire.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML]

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) [HTML]

datacenter (1): www.wordscope.ca (v4.0.br)

'Solemnizer marriage' ->

Date index: 2023-07-01