Translation of "agency transfer system " (English → French) :

payment system [ clearing and settlement system | EFTS | electronic funds transfer system | FTS | funds transfer system | IFTS | interbank funds transfer system | payment and settlement system | securities settlement system | electronic funds transfer(UNBIS) ]

European Community Course Credit Transfer System | European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System | European credit transfer system | ECTS [Abbr.]

centralised transfer system | centralized transfer system

intra-EU payment [ intra-Community payment | intra-Eurosystem transaction | TARGET2 | Target payment system | Target system | Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system ]

TARGET payment system | TARGET system | Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system | TARGET [Abbr.] | TARGET1 [Abbr.]

NATO Initial Data Transfer System [ NIDTS | NATO Initial Data Common User Transfer System ]

loss transfer system [ corporate loss transfer system ]

electron transport system | respiratory chain | electron transport chain | electron transfer chain | electron transfer system

European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice [ EU Agency for Large-Scale IT Systems | eu-LISA ]

2. Notes with concern that the Court's report emphasises the issues related to the valuation of the SIS II, VIS and EURODAC systems in the Agency’s accounts; notes furthermore that although the valuation was not materially misstated, the Court found those issues as essential and drew attention to this matter; notes that the operational management of those systems is the Agency's core task and that the systems were transferred from the Commission ...[+++] to the Agency in May 2013 by way of a non-exchange transaction; notes moreover that in the absence of reliable and complete information in respect of the total development cost of those systems, the value of the systems was recorded in the Agency’s accounts at their net book values as per the Commission’s books and updated at year-end; is concerned that those values relate mainly to hardware and off-the-shelf software components and do not include software development costs;

2. Notes with concern that the Court's report emphasises the issues related to the valuation of the SIS II, VIS and EURODAC systems in the Agency’s accounts; notes furthermore that although the valuation was not materially misstated, the Court found those issues as essential and drew attention to this matter; notes that the operational management of those systems is the Agency's core task and that the systems were transferred from the Commission ...[+++] to the Agency in May 2013 by way of a non-exchange transaction; notes moreover that in the absence of reliable and complete information in respect of the total development cost of those systems, the value of the systems was recorded in the Agency’s accounts at their net book values as per the Commission’s books and updated at year-end; is concerned that those values relate mainly to hardware and off-the-shelf software components and do not include software development costs;

3. Notes that, without calling into question its opinion on the reliability of eu-LISA’s accounts, the Court of Auditors draws attention to the fact that, in the absence of reliable and complete information on the total development costs for the Schengen Information System (SIS II), the Visa Information System (VIS) and EURODAC, following the transfer of operational management of those systems from the Commission to the agency in May 2013 those costs were recorded in the agency’s accounts at t ...[+++]heir net book values as per the Commission’s books and were then updated at year end;

Question No. 654 Hon. John McKay: With regard to the proposed Rouge National Urban Park (RNUP): (a) how does the RNUP legislation and strategic plan incorporate the ecological integrity, water quality and quantity, and habitat restoration goals and priorities of (i) the Provincial Greenbelt Plan, (ii) the Rouge North Management Plan Section 4.1.1.2, (iii) the 2007 Rouge River Watershed Strategy and its targeted natural heritage system, (iv) the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan (2007), (v) the Rouge Park Natural Heritage Action Plan (2008), (vi) the Toronto Great Lakes Area of Concern remedial action plan for Toronto, (vii) the feder ...[+++]al report “How Much Habitat is Enough” and the recommendation of more than 30% forest cover and 10% wetland cover per watershed, (viii) the National Parks Act, (ix) the Ontario Provincial Parks Act, (x) the draft Rouge River Watershed Fisheries Management Plan (2011), (xi) the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, (xii) the Endangered Species Act, (xiii) other relevant provincial, municipal and federal legislation; (b) how has the government addressed the issues raised in the unanimous November 2012 City of Toronto Motion on RNUP; (c) why has the promised RNUP “Transition Advisory Committee” not been created, (i) what is the updated timetable for the creation of this committee, (ii) what individuals or entities will comprise the advisory committee, (iii) what mandate will the advisory committee be given; (d) what steps have Environment Canada, Parks Canada and the government taken to assess the water quality, biodiversity, migratory fisheries, climatic, flood and erosion control, public health and ecological service benefits of restoring the majority of the public lands in Rouge Park to forest, wetland and meadow vegetation; (e) will the federally-owned and provincially-designated Greenbelt “Natural Heritage System” and Oak Ridges Moraine lands in north Pickering be included as part of the RNUP Study Area; (f) will the “Federal ...