Traduction de «failed element » (Anglais → Français) :

6. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 4, a group shall be deemed to be failing or likely to fail where the group infringes or there are objective elements to support a determination that the group, in the near future, will infringe its consolidated prudential requirements in a way that would justify action by the competent authority including but not limited to because the group has incurred or is likely to incur losses that will deplete all or a significant amount of its own funds.

5. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 3, a group shall be deemed to be failing or to be likely to fail where the group infringes, or there are objective elements to support a determination that the group, in the near future, will infringe its consolidated prudential requirements in a way that would justify action by the ECB or the national competent authority, including but not limited to the fact that the group has incurred or is likely to incur losses that will deplete all or a significant amount of its own funds.

6. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 4, a group shall be deemed to be failing or likely to fail where the group infringes or there are objective elements to support a determination that the group, in the near future, will infringe its consolidated prudential requirements in a way that would justify action by the competent authority including but not limited to because the group has incurred or is likely to incur losses that will deplete all or a significant amount of its own funds.

4. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 2, a group shall be deemed to be failing or likely to fail where the group is in breach or there are objective elements to support a determination that the group will be in breach, in the near future, of its consolidated prudential requirements in a way that would justify action by the competent authority including but not limited to because the group has incurred or is likely to incur losses that will deplete all or a significant amount of its own funds.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Rule 50 of Commission Regulation No 2868/95 and Article 76(2) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal: (i) based its reasoning and decision on a fact that was not alleged or submitted by the parties, nor referred to in the contested decision, namely that the contested sign will primarily or exclusively be perceived as ‘ULTRA’ with a rounded figurative element; (ii) failed to address important arguments and evidence submitted by the applicant, regarding conceptual similarity, failed to compare correctly the signs with regard to their overall impression, and failed accordingly to apply the g ...[+++]lobal comparison rule, as defined by the Court of Justice; (iii) failed to proceed to an evaluation of likelihood of confusion based on the sole facts that were placed before it; and (iv) failed to take into account in a legally sustainable manner the interdependence of relevant global factors, in particular, the identity or similarity of the goods and services, and the similarity between the signs.

exchange with or make available to institutions of other Member States the elements for identifying persons who change from one applicable national legislation to another, and together ensure that those identification elements are retained and correspond, or, failing that, provide those persons with the means to access their identification elements directly;