Traduction de «force generation capacity » (Anglais → Français) :

force build-up capacity | force generation capacity

electrical generating capacity [ generating capacity | generating capability ]

forced expired volume in one second/forced vital capacity ratio [ forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio | capacity ratio | ratio of FEV1 to FVC | FEV1/FVC ratio ]

loss of capacity | loss of generating capacity

forced expiratory flow between 200 and 1200 ml of the forced vital capacity,forced expiratory flow 200-1200,FEF200-1200,maximal expiratory flow rate 200-1200,MEFR200-1200

forced expiratory flow 25-75%,maximum midexpiratory flow(rate),FEF25-75,FMF25-75,MMEF25-75,MMF,MMFR | forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the forced vital capacity

CDS Action Team 2 - Force Generation [ CAT 2 - FG | CAT 2 - Force Generation ]

installed capacity | installed generating capacity

generating capacity

excess generating capacity

24. Is dismayed by the persistent problems of force generation encountered around the launch of military missions; notes that, with the exception of EUTM Mali, to which 23 Member States are making an effective contribution, all current EU military operations involve no more than six Member States; encourages Member States to contribute more forces to operations, when the national capabilities that are required are available; stresses the need for a common and cooperative approach in dealing with force generation problems; welcomes ...[+++] the contributions made by third countries that reflect the vitality of partnerships forged under the CSDP; calls on Member States to show a greater willingness as regards EU military operations and to contribute accordingly from the resources and capacities they possess for such involvement;

24. Is dismayed by the persistent problems of force generation encountered around the launch of military missions; notes that, with the exception of EUTM Mali, to which 23 Member States are making an effective contribution, all current EU military operations involve no more than six Member States; encourages Member States to contribute more forces to operations, when the national capabilities that are required are available; stresses the need for a common and cooperative approach in dealing with force generation problems; welcomes ...[+++] the contributions made by third countries that reflect the vitality of partnerships forged under the CSDP; calls on Member States to show a greater willingness as regards EU military operations and to contribute accordingly from the resources and capacities they possess for such involvement;

24. Notes the fact that EU battlegroups have never yet been deployed and considers that their existence will be difficult to justify over time; stresses that they constitute an important tool for timely force generation, training and rapid reaction; welcomes the decision to address this issue during the December Summit; is convinced that the EU should dispose of high-readiness standing battle forces, with land, air, naval, cyber and special forces components and a high level of ambition; underlines the fact that EU battlegroups should be deployable for all types of crises, including climate-driven humanitarian crisis; favours a more ...[+++] flexible and targeted approach to enhance the response and adaptability to different crisis situations, and to improve modularity in order to close gaps during the initial phases of the launch of CSDP operations without, however, compromising the operational capacity of the battlegroup as a whole;

24. Notes the fact that EU battlegroups have never yet been deployed and considers that their existence will be difficult to justify over time; stresses that they constitute an important tool for timely force generation, training and rapid reaction; welcomes the decision to address this issue during the December Summit; is convinced that the EU should dispose of high-readiness standing battle forces, with land, air, naval, cyber and special forces components and a high level of ambition; underlines the fact that EU battlegroups should be deployable for all types of crises, including climate-driven humanitarian crisis; favours a more ...[+++] flexible and targeted approach to enhance the response and adaptability to different crisis situations, and to improve modularity in order to close gaps during the initial phases of the launch of CSDP operations without, however, compromising the operational capacity of the battlegroup as a whole;