Traduction de «justification conference » (Anglais → Français) :

show cause hearing [ justification conference | show cause conference ]

Definition: Personality disorder characterized by excessive sensitivity to setbacks, unforgiveness of insults; suspiciousness and a tendency to distort experience by misconstruing the neutral or friendly actions of others as hostile or contemptuous; recurrent suspicions, without justification, regarding the sexual fidelity of the spouse or sexual partner; and a combative and tenacious sense of personal rights. There may be excessive self-importance, and there is often excessive self-reference. | Personality (disorder):expansive par ...[+++]anoid | fanatic | querulant | paranoid | sensitive paranoid

justification of the test case | test case justification

numeric justification | numerical justification

numeric justification on the left side | numerical justification on the left side

CE Authorization for Project - Justification [ Construction Engineering Authorization for Project - Justification ]

Office de justification de la diffusion [ OJD | Office de justification des tirages ]

Team conference

Child at risk-case conference

interpreting language in conferences | interpreting languages in conferences | deliver language interpretation in conferences | interpret languages in conferences

Social media networks cannot deprive consumers of their right to go to court in their Member State of residence; Social media networks cannot require consumers to waive mandatory rights, such as their right to withdraw from an on-line purchase; Terms of services cannot limit or totally exclude the liability of Social media networks in connection with the performance of the service; Sponsored content cannot be hidden, but should be identifiable as such; Social media networks cannot unilaterally change terms and conditions without clearly informing consumers about the justification and without given them the possibility to cancel the c ...[+++]ontract, with adequate notice; Terms of services cannot confer unlimited and discretionary power to social media operators on the removal of content.

Notes that international agreements have binding force and an impact on EU legislation, and points to the need for negotiations to be transparent throughout the entire process, implying that the institutions should publish the negotiating mandate conferred on the EU negotiator without undermining the EU’s negotiating position; considers that documents related to international agreements should be public in principle, without prejudice to legitimate exceptions and without undermining the trust necessary between the parties concerned to achieve effective negotiations; regrets that the Commission and the Council routinely classify all doc ...[+++]uments relating to negotiations, thereby limiting citizens’ access to information; maintains that the public should be given access to all relevant negotiating documents, including those already agreed on, with the exception of those which are considered sensitive, with a clear justification on a case-by-case basis, in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.

Furthermore, the Court declared in the EDF case that, ‘[.] for the purposes of showing that, before or at the same time as conferring the advantage, the Member State took that decision as a shareholder, it is not enough to rely on economic evaluations made after the advantage was conferred, on a retrospective finding that the investment made by the Member State concerned was actually profitable, or on subsequent justifications of the course of action actually chosen’ (53).

Furthermore, the Court declared in the EDF case that, ‘[.] for the purposes of showing that, before or at the same time as conferring the advantage, the Member State took that decision as a shareholder, it is not enough to rely on economic evaluations made after the advantage was conferred, on a retrospective finding that the investment made by the Member State concerned was actually profitable, or on subsequent justifications of the course of action actually chosen’ (79).