Translation of "mandatory " (English → French) :

age of mandatory separation | compulsory age of retirement | compulsory retirement age | default retirement age | mandatory age of retirement | mandatory age of separation | mandatory retirement age | CRA [Abbr.] | DRA [Abbr.]

mandatory occupational benefits provision | mandatory benefit coverage | mandatory pension coverage

mandatory incident reporting system | mandatory occurrence reporting system | MORS [Abbr.]

mandatory enter field | mandatory entry field

employee exempt from mandatory insurance | employee not subject to mandatory benefit coverage | employee exempt from mandatory benefit coverage | employee exempted from mandatory benefit coverage

harmonized mandatory control system [ HMCS | harmonised mandatory control system | harmonised mandatory control scheme ]

employee mandatorily insured by an occupational benefits scheme | employee mandatorily insured | employee mandatorily insured by a personnel welfare institution | employee subject to mandatory benefit coverage | person subject to mandatory benefit coverage | employee subject to mandatory insurance

overriding mandatory provision | overriding mandatory rule | overriding rule

compulsory membership [ mandatory membership | mandatory participation ]

child abuse mandatory reporting [ mandatory reporting for child abuse ]

Mandatory provision: // In the Rome Convention, the expression "mandatory provision" covers multiple realities: it designates at the same time overriding mandatory rules in the meaning of Article 7, a concept specific to private international law, and public-policy rules of national law.

‘radio mandatory zone (RMZ)’ means an airspace of defined dimensions wherein the carriage and operation of radio equipment is mandatory.

...ute liability amount and mandatory insurance coverage for nuclear operators to $1 billion: (a) has the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) asked Ontario Power Generation whether removing the cap on operator liability, while maintaining the level of absolute liability and mandatory insurance coverage required under the Act at $1 billion, would increase its generation costs and, if so, what were the details of the response, including the estimated increased cost-per-kWh; (b) has the DNR asked Bruce Power whether removing the cap on operator liability, while maintaining the level of absolute liability and mandatory insurance coverage ...[+++]required under the Act at $1 billion, would increase its generation costs and, if so, what were the details of the response, including the estimated increased cost-per-kWh; (c) has the DNR asked New Brunswick Power whether removing the cap on operator liability, while maintaining the level of absolute liability and mandatory insurance coverage, would increase its generation costs and, if so, what were the details of the response, including the estimated increased cost-per-kWh; (d) in the scenario in which the limit on reactor liability is removed while the mandatory insurance coverage and absolute liability of the operator remain at $1 billion, what is the DNR's estimate of the impacts that removing the cap on liability would have on provincial electricity rates, (i) what additional impacts would there be if the mandatory insurance coverage and absolute liability of the operator were increased to $1.5 billion, all other things being equal, (ii) what would the additional impacts be if the mandatory insurance coverage and absolute liability of the operator were increased to $2 billion, all other things being equal; (e) does the government determine the amount of liability required of nuclear operators by estimating whether it will be within the capacity of insurers to provide insurance at reasonable costs and, if so, (i) did the government use the same criterion for determining the absolute liability and insurance requirement for offshore operators, (ii) how does the government define “reasonable costs” for insurance, (iii) what is the limit in co ...

...rtaking to establish new mandatory reporting standards for Canadian extractive companies: (a) what steps has the government taken since the 39th G8 Summit to develop a comprehensive bill that would require Canadian companies to disclose any payments made to foreign governments; (b) what steps did the government take prior to the 39th G8 Summit to develop a comprehensive bill that would require Canadian companies to disclose any payments made to foreign governments; (c) does the Prime Minister’s commitment, as referred to in (a), apply exclusively to Canadian extractive corporations, (i) does it apply exclusively to Canadian corporat ...[+++]ions as regards extractive operations in foreign countries, (ii) what is the scope of said commitment; (d) has the government prepared or reviewed any draft bill that proposes to implement such reporting requirements as referred to in (a) and if so, to what extent has it consulted on this issue, (i) with whom, (ii) when; (e) has the government conducted or reviewed any studies regarding the effect of mandatory reporting requirements on increasing corporate accountability and combatting corruption; (f) has the government compiled or reviewed any other evidence regarding the effect of mandatory reporting requirements on increasing corporate accountability and combatting corruption; (g) has the Department of Justice been consulted with regard to the formulation of a comprehensive reporting regime that would apply to Canadian companies; (h) has the government consulted with the Department of Justice, or sought a legal opinion from any other source, as to the constitutionality of a mandatory disclosure regime as referred to in (a); (i) has the government expressed any position, either publically or internally, as to the constitutionality of such a mandatory disclosure regime as applied to Canadian companies; (j) has the government consulted with provincial and territorial First Ministers regarding the Prime Minister’s commitment referred to in (a) and, if so, (i) who were the parties to any such consultations, (ii) what w ...